Eating "clean" pay off big at the scale!
In the last 3 weeks I have really been eating "Clean", as much organic and non-GMO as I can. My intake of calories is the same and I have not upped my exercise. Well as of this morning at my weight loss meeting I am down 10lbs from the beginning of the change in diet to whole foods! That is a over them 3 lbs a week lose just eating better.:love:
|
Contrats to you!
How about some examples/ typical meals and snacks? Also did you carbo/fat/protein mix change? |
Congrats. When I changed to healthy eating the weight came off really fast. Even now when Im on a plateau the change in my eating
has given me huge health and mood benefits. Charlie |
Breatfast 304 cal
2 fried eggs cooked in bell pepper rings. I cut bell peppers into 1/2 inch rings removing seeds and veins, red is my fav. 190 cal 1 small avocado 114 snack 343 apple with 2 T peanut butter and 1 T honey raw lunch 341 cal stirfry with quinoa and brown rice (mushrooms, zucchinni, mung beans and bell pepers) make this up on sundays and frezze it to reheat when I want it. snack 210 plain greek yogurt with fresh sliced strawberries with 1 T honey. Dinner 405 Chili with beef steak and beans late night sweet fix 120 I make my own pudding pops. They are rich and creamy and right around 120 cal. Day total: 1723 cal I am not sure of the brake down other then this. I am gluten intolerant so carbs are not a big deal to me. I change out meals all the time but I always keep right around these numbers. I always use full fat, and real sugar! |
That looks pretty excellent - be aware that when you go off prepared foods your salt intake will plummet and your water retention / weight may similarly plummet. I might have to try your lunch idea, I'm getting burned out on my high-sodium lunch. :)
|
Losing weight is a pretty simple equation:
Calories in - Calories Out - Basal Metabolic Rate = Net Calories. Eating clean/organic/Non-GMO/Paleo has very little impact on the equation. |
if you could replace pudding dessert with a fruit cup, drop the yogurt and peanut butter, you'd be 100% paleo diet. It seems to be a lot easier to feel full when you drop all the processed foods, so your calorie consumption drops, and your body has to burn off some fat to keep up with your calorie deficit.
Anyway, congrats Shelly, that's awesome and amazing! |
I started "juicing" my breakfast using fruits and vegetables and I find it sticks with me a lot longer than just about anything else and I tend to not eat as much. I average 1800/1900 a day but since juicing I've found I end up eating 200 to 300 calories less.
|
Originally Posted by Shellyrides
(Post 15739431)
In the last 3 weeks I have really been eating "Clean", as much organic and non-GMO as I can. My intake of calories is the same and I have not upped my exercise. Well as of this morning at my weight loss meeting I am down 10lbs from the beginning of the change in diet to whole foods! That is a over them 3 lbs a week lose just eating better.:love:
|
Originally Posted by UberGeek
(Post 15740598)
Eating clean/organic/Non-GMO/Paleo has very little impact on the equation.
There are also the less directly tangible factors that are important to tree hugger types like me. Grass fed beef pollutes much less, in spite of the fact that is has a slightly larger carbon foot print from having to be trucked further,
Originally Posted by Shellyrides
(Post 15739666)
Dinner 405
Chili with beef steak and beans |
Originally Posted by mr_pedro
(Post 15741755)
The type of food that you eat has a big impact on how how much you eat if you simply follow your appetite. You dropped weight because you are eating less calories and by eating the right things you are not feeling too hungry.
|
Originally Posted by UberGeek
(Post 15740598)
Losing weight is a pretty simple equation:
Calories in - Calories Out - Basal Metabolic Rate = Net Calories. Eating clean/organic/Non-GMO/Paleo has very little impact on the equation. |
Originally Posted by UberGeek
(Post 15740598)
Losing weight is a pretty simple equation:
Calories in - Calories Out - Basal Metabolic Rate = Net Calories. Eating clean/organic/Non-GMO/Paleo has very little impact on the equation. It's not so simplistic for me. I can eat a double whooper combo meal at 1360 calories once per day. Or 2 huge plates of Romain lettuce, beans, mushrooms, tomatoes, and cucumbers along with 4 servings of fruit to get to the same calories. If I could hang on I should get to the same place using the above equation. Problem is with the BK meal I'm starving most of the day, with choice #2 I'm happy. I think the second choice would rate further up the "clean" scale than the first. What matters is what works for each of us. One of the great things about this forum is the number of people who have beat the dismal odds of successful weight loss. There's so many of us who've lost 50 or more lbs and kept it off for greater than 2 years. Almost unheard of in commercial diet circles despite what the marketers would have you believe. My take on the murky weight loss statistics is it appears to be less than 2% meet the above litmus test. It's sure nice to share experiences with you 2%ers. |
Originally Posted by bbeasley
(Post 15742269)
It's not so simplistic for me. I can eat a double whooper combo meal at 1360 calories once per day. Or 2 huge plates of Romain lettuce, beans, mushrooms, tomatoes, and cucumbers along with 4 servings of fruit to get to the same calories. If I could hang on I should get to the same place using the above equation. Problem is with the BK meal I'm starving most of the day, with choice #2 I'm happy. I think the second choice would rate further up the "clean" scale than the first.
|
Originally Posted by sstorkel
(Post 15742336)
The question is: will you see a difference between eating organic Romaine lettuce, beans, mushrooms, tomatoes and cucumbers versus non-organic versions of the same stuff? I know that I don't...
|
Originally Posted by UberGeek
(Post 15740598)
Losing weight is a pretty simple equation:
Calories in - Calories Out - Basal Metabolic Rate = Net Calories. Eating clean/organic/Non-GMO/Paleo has very little impact on the equation. |
Originally Posted by bbeasley
(Post 15742269)
It's not so simplistic for me. I can eat a double whooper combo meal at 1360 calories once per day. Or 2 huge plates of Romain lettuce, beans, mushrooms, tomatoes, and cucumbers along with 4 servings of fruit to get to the same calories. If I could hang on I should get to the same place using the above equation. Problem is with the BK meal I'm starving most of the day, with choice #2 I'm happy. I think the second choice would rate further up the "clean" scale than the first.
The calories in - calories out equation still applies. The BK meal is simply more calorie dense and occupies less space in your stomach than the places of veggies/fruits. Succumbing to the hunger you suffer from as a result and not loosing weight is an issue of will power and lack of self control.. I suffer from the latter. :) |
Originally Posted by bbeasley
(Post 15742523)
Yeah, good point and I don't know the answer.
Originally Posted by matthewk459
(Post 15742944)
Succumbing to the hunger you suffer from as a result and not loosing weight is an issue of will power and lack of self control.. I suffer from the latter. :)
|
Originally Posted by bbeasley
(Post 15742269)
It's not so simplistic for me. I can eat a double whooper combo meal at 1360 calories once per day. Or 2 huge plates of Romain lettuce, beans, mushrooms, tomatoes, and cucumbers along with 4 servings of fruit to get to the same calories. If I could hang on I should get to the same place using the above equation. Problem is with the BK meal I'm starving most of the day, with choice #2 I'm happy. I think the second choice would rate further up the "clean" scale than the first.
Originally Posted by sstorkel
(Post 15742336)
The question is: will you see a difference between eating organic Romaine lettuce, beans, mushrooms, tomatoes and cucumbers versus non-organic versions of the same stuff? I know that I don't...
While I agree with bbeasley in not knowing if organic will be better for weight loss; I do know that if you eat Romaine lettuce, beans, mushrooms, tomatoes and cucumbers one will be (feel) fuller and feel fuller longer than with the BK or any other meal in the of the same kind. Why because the bulk factor is higher. If the only "clean" factor to Shelly's diet is eating less processed foods and it is working for the OP then hey who are we to knock the plan! |
Originally Posted by bbeasley
(Post 15742269)
What matters is what works for each of us. One of the great things about this forum is the number of people who have beat the dismal odds of successful weight loss. There's so many of us who've lost 50 or more lbs and kept it off for greater than 2 years. Almost unheard of in commercial diet circles despite what the marketers would have you believe. My take on the murky weight loss statistics is it appears to be less than 2% meet the above litmus test. It's sure nice to share experiences with you 2%ers.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.