PR to shame those who menace weaker users?
The USA sense of macho has perhaps had some good aspects -- that advertisers appeal to -- but it has also always included "cowardly victimizing of the weaker."
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.' Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"? |
Personally, I think those that would persecute weaker beings would consider it a badge of honor and make a game out of increasing their level of persecution. I admit I am cynical and jaded.
|
Originally Posted by JeffOYB
(Post 18854204)
The USA sense of macho has perhaps had some good aspects -- that advertisers appeal to -- but it has also always included "cowardly victimizing of the weaker."
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.' Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"? |
My knee jerk reaction was no, but I do think it would help.
In the first place there are drivers who just don't know any better and such a PR campaign would not only inform them about safe passing but also drive it home that we are, in fact, road users. Eradicating ignorance is always worthy and should be the primary goal of any PR campaign in my opinion. Secondly there is a small but real population who have no sense of empathy, no concern for the well-being of others, and who are only held in check by the known consequences of violating social constraints. I don't know if you can artificially create such a thing, or bring it to the surface of public awareness by analogy, but it's worth a try. |
I think that to emphasize "weaker beings" in any way would be a negative... already, in the minds of some, cyclists represent the "40 year old virgin." Of course, the real irony is that cyclists, exercising routinely, could probably kick butt on many motorists that are only "strong" due to the size of their SUV.
No, a better "crying indian" type campaign would be to remind people that cyclists are brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers, generally people you know... not just faceless cycling bots out there to create havoc on the road. |
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 18854413)
[R]emind people that cyclists are brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers, generally people you know... not just faceless cycling bots out there to create havoc on the road.
-mr. bill |
https://bikepgh.org/wp-content/uploa...e2-620x597.jpg |
5 minutes ago i was almost run over and chased down only to almost get run over again, and then loony floored it and sped off, there's no reason to even report it, what do you plan on stopping these kind of people with this kind of mentality?
people on bikes are real people, sure, but not to the person in the car, then everything outside the car is there to annoy them, and only them :lol: the moment they get out of the car they suddenly want to have safe roads, no cars around, cookies and rainbows.. |
I love the idea, but who would pay for and produce the ad?!
|
Originally Posted by ypsetihw
(Post 18854543)
I love the idea, but who would pay for and produce the ad?!
|
While admitting I don't watch much TV, do we still have Public Service Announcements? I remember a few from the past. "Expect the Unexpected. Watch Out for the Other Guy". "Buckle up for Safety". "Keep America Beautiful, Don't Litter". "Just Say No".
I was thinking a PSA regarding Bicycles and how vulnerable they are. I think the thing that genec posted in #7 is perfect, and could be done on a rotating basis. I remember "Brought to You by the Ad Council". Or maybe the Department of Transportation or the National Transportation Safety Board. I'm in favor of it and I think it would be somewhat effective. |
Originally Posted by Equinox
(Post 18854658)
"Just Say No".
|
Originally Posted by italktocats
(Post 18854705)
i dont think that one worked very well.. :lol:
|
If you think of yourself as a "weaker being" you need to develop some resilience.
|
Originally Posted by dksix
(Post 18854218)
I don't think so. Given the mentality the group you speak of has they would more than likely find it amusing and in turn be encouraged, probably end up with a new YouTube video genre like people honking at guys on golf course.
|
Originally Posted by JeffOYB
(Post 18854204)
The USA sense of macho has perhaps had some good aspects -- that advertisers appeal to -- but it has also always included "cowardly victimizing of the weaker."
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.' Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"? |
Originally Posted by Equinox
(Post 18854658)
While admitting I don't watch much TV, do we still have Public Service Announcements? I remember a few from the past. "Expect the Unexpected. Watch Out for the Other Guy". "Buckle up for Safety". "Keep America Beautiful, Don't Litter". "Just Say No".
I was thinking a PSA regarding Bicycles and how vulnerable they are. I think the thing that genec posted in #7 is perfect, and could be done on a rotating basis. I remember "Brought to You by the Ad Council". Or maybe the Department of Transportation or the National Transportation Safety Board. I'm in favor of it and I think it would be somewhat effective. |
Originally Posted by JeffOYB
(Post 18854204)
The USA sense of macho has perhaps had some good aspects -- that advertisers appeal to -- but it has also always included "cowardly victimizing of the weaker."
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.' Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"? |
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 18854947)
Just want to give credit where credit is due. mr. bill pointed me in the right direction, I merely followed the link and posted what was there, which I had never seen before. I think it is great and would love to see it run from time to time like you mention.
|
Originally Posted by dksix
(Post 18855042)
I don't think it would reach the types that I first come to mind I read the OP but after seeing some of these ideas I have to think it would resonate with some drivers. Something like was the picture being posted would have to make some think about the "who" that's on the bike. Maybe a catchy phase like "click it or ticket" with safe passing distance might be worthwhile too. I had one come around my today no more than 6" from my bars, and that was on a straight road with 3 or 4 hundred yards of forward visibility ahead and not another car is sight. I don't have much hope of reaching people like that, they simply think bikes shouldn't be on the roads.
Of course in the situation like you mentioned, some AH could just say "yeah, inches... ha ha... " and really get close. |
Originally Posted by baron von trail
(Post 18855021)
I just rather see a campaign aimed at getting the drivers of cars, trucks and motorcycles to use mufflers that actually, you know, muffle the noise. I'm sick of being passed by vehicles blasting 90-plus Db into my left ear.
I understand the need, for protection of those with sight impairment... but gosh, wouldn't be nicer to work toward a quieter environment? Bit of irony... I just moved to a rural area... and thought it would be quiet. Turns out when it is quiet, all the sounds travel further... "you hear everything..." Of course the reality is that the total db level average is indeed lower. ;) |
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 18855062)
I always thought it was ironic that there was discussion of adding noise to electric vehicles.
I understand the need, for protection of those with sight impairment... but gosh, wouldn't be nicer to work toward a quieter environment? Bit of irony... I just moved to a rural area... and thought it would be quiet. Turns out when it is quiet, all the sounds travel further... "you hear everything..." Of course the reality is that the total db level average is indeed lower. ;) I have a pet peeve about loud vehicles and have found the vehicles most always match the operators loud and obnoxious personalizes. Even when I kept fast cars I never had one that was loud, there is a huge difference between have a powerful tone and just being loud. |
Originally Posted by JeffOYB
(Post 18854204)
The USA sense of macho has perhaps had some good aspects -- that advertisers appeal to -- but it has also always included "cowardly victimizing of the weaker."
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.' Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"? |
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 18855062)
I always thought it was ironic that there was discussion of adding noise to electric vehicles.
I understand the need, for protection of those with sight impairment... but gosh, wouldn't be nicer to work toward a quieter environment? Bit of irony... I just moved to a rural area... and thought it would be quiet. Turns out when it is quiet, all the sounds travel further... "you hear everything..." Of course the reality is that the total db level average is indeed lower. ;) |
PR to shame those who menace weaker users?
Originally Posted by wphamilton
(Post 18854258)
My knee jerk reaction was no, but I do think it would help...
Secondly there is a small but real population who have no sense of empathy, no concern for the well-being of others, and who are only held in check by the known consequences of violating social constraints. I don't know if you can artificially create such a thing, or bring it to the surface of public awareness by analogy, but it's worth a try. My only satisfactory retribution is to give them my previously-described Bicyclist Curse. (I repeatedly jab my pointed right index finger in their direction, while shouting an accusatory, ”You, you, you…”). The possibility of metaphysical retribution is more satisfying than the middle finger. :notamused: I do also bestow Bicyclist Blessings on drivers who show even a modicum of respect, with a wave of the hand. I estimate I give Blessings to Curses in a ratio of about at least 25 to 1. |
Based upon your multiple recent posts I am guessing that you have personal machoism/bullying issues.
I am sorry to hear that but trying to translate your issues into what you perceive to be road cycling culture is quite laughable bro |
I have no doubt a campaign focused on getting motorists to interact more safely and courteously with bicyclists (more vulnerable, not weaker) would work. It's would take a long time and take a multi-media approach and be incredibly expensive, but it would work. Most folks I know use Facebook. Zuckerberg just took up cycling. If he were to set FB to give all users a bicycle safety message in their feed each time they signed on, that would be an easy way to cheaply get out a mass message. There are some good bang for the buck ways to do it. I just don't think the will is there.
|
|
Originally Posted by italktocats
(Post 18854536)
5 minutes ago i was almost run over and chased down only to almost get run over again, and then loony floored it and sped off, there's no reason to even report it, what do you plan on stopping these kind of people with this kind of mentality?
|
Originally Posted by Moe Zhoost
(Post 18854842)
If you think of yourself as a "weaker being" you need to develop some resilience.
It's the same as the new "Vulnerable User" laws being passed almost everywhere. Vulnerable is a fact. When a driver comes up upon a biker: the biker is weaker -- that is, in English, the biker could be menaced or hit by the car without threat to the driver. In our culture there is a perceived opportunity to hassle, discourage, or even just not notice or respect another road-user and come close to them and scare them -- and the weaker user would have no recourse. PSA ads to increase awareness would go a long way. Probably only a few are so sociopathic that they'd cowardly menace bikers, but it doesn't take many. They feel emboldened. Maybe they're 1 in 1000. Yet they feel confident. PSA ads could help ostracize them. Let them know it's not tolerable. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:30 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.