Cyclist Average Speed Progression?
Hey there, was wondering if there was some sort of chart or spreadsheet out there that logs the progression of beginner cyclist to becoming pro cyclist. Like with average speeds and time markers. I'd like to get an idea of how long it might take to get from say a Cat 5 to possibly a Cat 1. I think this would be a great tool for training that I can reference.
|
Originally Posted by NicklesnDimes
(Post 21235172)
Hey there, was wondering if there was some sort of chart or spreadsheet out there that logs the progression of beginner cyclist to becoming pro cyclist. Like with average speeds and time markers. I'd like to get an idea of how long it might take to get from say a Cat 5 to possibly a Cat 1. I think this would be a great tool for training that I can reference.
|
Andrew Coggan's well know chart is here and a good related article is here.
Basically, if you measure the maximum power you can put out for 30 minutes straight, you can calculate your Functional Threshold Power. If you divide that by your weight in Kb, you have the W/Kg figure you see in the columns (under FT is the 30 minute/FTP value). If you train to increase your FTP, or lose weight, or both, you move up and you can roughly see where you would fall. |
I'd be careful with that, I have a 4.8 w/kg FTP (tested to the full hour), 5.5 w/kg 5-minute power (actually held that for 7 minutes in a recent zwift race) I'm only a cat 4 whose best placement was 2nd in a small cat 5 crit.
It takes a lot more than an arbitrary number to dictate what makes a particular category, Andrew Coggan's chart simply shows averages for people in those categories, but it doesn't show the race smarts you have to have. When it comes down to it, super talented people can achieve Cat 1/2 pretty easily, I've seen some go from cat 5 to cat 3 in a year, then cat 3 to cat 1 the following year. I've seen others who have been trying to move from 4 to 3 for 5 years, spending enormous amounts on coaches, all the best gear, training constantly, and being fearless. If you want to see where you stack up, go out to your local A ride, if you can hang in the group but get dropped when the hammer goes down expect to probably survive in the pack for a cat 5 race, but not actually contend for a podium. If you're never in fear of getting dropped, you consistently pull and make the occasional attack, you'd probably make a decent cat 4 or even pack fodder cat 3. If you're the guy that no one wants to show up because he'll tear everyone's legs off, make it a "hard" A ride, and probably already owns half the KOMs on the course people have been doing for years, you're in the cat 1/2 territory. So, that's my opinionated, egotistical, 2 cents answer. |
Originally Posted by firebird854
(Post 21235343)
I'd be careful with that, I have a 4.8 w/kg FTP (tested to the full hour), 5.5 w/kg 5-minute power (actually held that for 7 minutes in a recent zwift race) I'm only a cat 4 whose best placement was 2nd in a small cat 5 crit.
It takes a lot more than an arbitrary number to dictate what makes a particular category, Andrew Coggan's chart simply shows averages for people in those categories, but it doesn't show the race smarts you have to have. When it comes down to it, super talented people can achieve Cat 1/2 pretty easily, I've seen some go from cat 5 to cat 3 in a year, then cat 3 to cat 1 the following year. I've seen others who have been trying to move from 4 to 3 for 5 years, spending enormous amounts on coaches, all the best gear, training constantly, and being fearless. If you want to see where you stack up, go out to your local A ride, if you can hang in the group but get dropped when the hammer goes down expect to probably survive in the pack for a cat 5 race, but not actually contend for a podium. If you're never in fear of getting dropped, you consistently pull and make the occasional attack, you'd probably make a decent cat 4 or even pack fodder cat 3. If you're the guy that no one wants to show up because he'll tear everyone's legs off, make it a "hard" A ride, and probably already owns half the KOMs on the course people have been doing for years, you're in the cat 1/2 territory. One more edit - Power, power, power... Now keep in mind that power alone isn't an indicator of what you can do on a bike. What you need is to keep accurate training logs over time and work on developing your power output and your ability to maintain power over time AND recover. There's lots of racers out there capable of achieving 300 watts. There's not that many who can maintain that level over a long period of time, or maintain that level, rest at the back of the group for a minute, then attack at an even higher level and then settle back into a 300 watt sustained effort. I personally believe that power training can be extremely effective if you know what you are looking at and can develop it over time. So, that's my opinionated, egotistical, 2 cents answer. Oh - and forget "speed" - it's a worthless factor. In Lawrenceville GA I would do a 36 mile (World Championship) training shop ride and average 22-23mph at around 250 watts. In Utica NY I can do a (World Championship) training shop ride and average 15-16mph at around 275 watts. The difference is - they build much bigger hills here. Then there's wind, road conditions, strength of the group... Speed isn't even worth a hill of beans on the exact same course since weather conditions will always have an impact, as well as fitness and training load. |
Originally Posted by firebird854
(Post 21235343)
I'd be careful with that, I have a 4.8 w/kg FTP (tested to the full hour), 5.5 w/kg 5-minute power (actually held that for 7 minutes in a recent zwift race) I'm only a cat 4 whose best placement was 2nd in a small cat 5 crit.
It takes a lot more than an arbitrary number to dictate what makes a particular category, Andrew Coggan's chart simply shows averages for people in those categories, but it doesn't show the race smarts you have to have. When it comes down to it, super talented people can achieve Cat 1/2 pretty easily, I've seen some go from cat 5 to cat 3 in a year, then cat 3 to cat 1 the following year. I've seen others who have been trying to move from 4 to 3 for 5 years, spending enormous amounts on coaches, all the best gear, training constantly, and being fearless. If you want to see where you stack up, go out to your local A ride, if you can hang in the group but get dropped when the hammer goes down expect to probably survive in the pack for a cat 5 race, but not actually contend for a podium. If you're never in fear of getting dropped, you consistently pull and make the occasional attack, you'd probably make a decent cat 4 or even pack fodder cat 3. If you're the guy that no one wants to show up because he'll tear everyone's legs off, make it a "hard" A ride, and probably already owns half the KOMs on the course people have been doing for years, you're in the cat 1/2 territory. So, that's my opinionated, egotistical, 2 cents answer. Power doesn't necessarily mean squat, but, for your #'s unless you weigh 55 kg I'd seriously check my power meter. Again, maybe regional, but you could probably TT for a win in our local 4/5 road race. I've heard of people being eye watering strong on the bike, but not winning, but your #'s seem really really off for a 4/5 not being consistently top 5 or on the podium. I could see a 4/5 having an hour power of a 4.3 or so hour power not winning. But not 4.8. I'm 70kg so that'd nearly be 330 for an hour. You could TT our local RR with that and they'd let you go. Local guy lives a few houses down from me when he isn't off at college, he was a 4/5 super briefly with similar figures to yours and would just TT the local crit for the win. I didn't believe it, but checked out the Strava and sure enough........there's the finisher pic of him hammering solo across the line. Pan flat too. But, for the original poster..........just suffer the workouts, do the hammer group rides, and go race. The charts and stuff are pointless. |
Originally Posted by firebird854
(Post 21235343)
I'd be careful with that, I have a 4.8 w/kg FTP (tested to the full hour), 5.5 w/kg 5-minute power (actually held that for 7 minutes in a recent zwift race) I'm only a cat 4 whose best placement was 2nd in a small cat 5 crit.
It takes a lot more than an arbitrary number to dictate what makes a particular category, Andrew Coggan's chart simply shows averages for people in those categories, but it doesn't show the race smarts you have to have. When it comes down to it, super talented people can achieve Cat 1/2 pretty easily, I've seen some go from cat 5 to cat 3 in a year, then cat 3 to cat 1 the following year. I've seen others who have been trying to move from 4 to 3 for 5 years, spending enormous amounts on coaches, all the best gear, training constantly, and being fearless. If you want to see where you stack up, go out to your local A ride, if you can hang in the group but get dropped when the hammer goes down expect to probably survive in the pack for a cat 5 race, but not actually contend for a podium. If you're never in fear of getting dropped, you consistently pull and make the occasional attack, you'd probably make a decent cat 4 or even pack fodder cat 3. If you're the guy that no one wants to show up because he'll tear everyone's legs off, make it a "hard" A ride, and probably already owns half the KOMs on the course people have been doing for years, you're in the cat 1/2 territory. So, that's my opinionated, egotistical, 2 cents answer. |
I posted this in a different thread, but the information is the same. Average speed means almost nothing, and is waaaay down on the list of "usable data" to gauge performance.
I plucked three solo rides from my data that show three different average speeds in increasing order. A newer rider might think 15.8 to be easy, 19.5 would be iffy and 22.2 to be out of their reach. The thing is, the normalized power data is almost identical for two of the rides (261W/260W), but the ride with the lowest NP (245W) was the hardest. I don't mean to toot my own horn, but a newer rider wouldn't have been able to keep up on any of these rides, especially the 15.8 mph average. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...9e61566cfa.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...62878fa585.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...f2a3c9551f.jpg If someone rode the same route every day for a year they'd notice that on the same route with the same windspeed, a headwind on the wrong sections can pull 1-2 mph off of an average. Even the difference in air density due to temperature can knock 0.5 mph off of an average. When I get asked "what's your average?" when someone is considering riding with me I'll just say "I can go whatever speed you want. Let's ride." |
Those w/Kg charts are funny to me. I apparently have a mid-Cat 3 level FTP, but my best 1 min power puts me almost at the amateur level. Having actually raced in 3/4 fields, I do tend to struggle with surges but do fine when the pace is high but steady, so maybe there is some truth to that.
|
Originally Posted by Cypress
(Post 21235393)
I posted this in a different thread, but the information is the same. Average speed means almost nothing, and is waaaay down on the list of "usable data" to gauge performance.
I plucked three solo rides from my data that show three different average speeds in increasing order. A newer rider might think 15.8 to be easy, 19.5 would be iffy and 22.2 to be out of their reach. The thing is, the normalized power data is almost identical for two of the rides (261W/260W), but the ride with the lowest NP (245W) was the hardest. I don't mean to toot my own horn, but a newer rider wouldn't have been able to keep up on any of these rides, especially the 15.8 mph average. If someone rode the same route every day for a year they'd notice that on the same route with the same windspeed, a headwind on the wrong sections can pull 1-2 mph off of an average. Even the difference in air density due to temperature can knock 0.5 mph off of an average. When I get asked "what's your average?" when someone is considering riding with me I'll just say "I can go whatever speed you want. Let's ride." Goes to show how malleable nominal power and average speed are. That NP is very inflated due to the many high power hill sprints. The average speed very low, again, hill sprints. Also, though, how big a dong a person has on WNW or Strava segments doesn't mean anything for racing. It's WNW. A mix of a couple racers and a bunch of A-rider joes. I'm a good example of this one. A few pretty solid local KOM's and top 10's, can mix it up on most hammer rides............won't be sniffing a podium anytiime soon. Pack fodder. |
Cat 5: hey guys, what’s your average speed?
Cat 4: hmm, my average speed is going up but I never place Cat 3: hmm, I’m beginning to place but my average speed is going down Cat 2: average speed is meaningless Cat 1: WTF does average speed have to do with anything? |
Originally Posted by caloso
(Post 21235417)
Cat 5: hey guys, what’s your average speed?
Cat 4: hmm, my average speed is going up but I never place Cat 3: hmm, I’m beginning to place but my average speed is going down Cat 2: average speed is meaningless Cat 1: WTF does average speed have to do with anything? |
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
(Post 21235402)
Those w/Kg charts are funny to me. I apparently have a mid-Cat 3 level FTP, but my best 1 min power puts me almost at the amateur level. Having actually raced in 3/4 fields, I do tend to struggle with surges but do fine when the pace is high but steady, so maybe there is some truth to that.
|
Originally Posted by Cypress
(Post 21235393)
I posted this in a different thread, but the information is the same. Average speed means almost nothing, and is waaaay down on the list of "usable data" to gauge performance.
I plucked three solo rides from my data that show three different average speeds in increasing order. A newer rider might think 15.8 to be easy, 19.5 would be iffy and 22.2 to be out of their reach. The thing is, the normalized power data is almost identical for two of the rides (261W/260W), but the ride with the lowest NP (245W) was the hardest. I don't mean to toot my own horn, but a newer rider wouldn't have been able to keep up on any of these rides, especially the 15.8 mph average. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...9e61566cfa.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...62878fa585.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...f2a3c9551f.jpg If someone rode the same route every day for a year they'd notice that on the same route with the same windspeed, a headwind on the wrong sections can pull 1-2 mph off of an average. Even the difference in air density due to temperature can knock 0.5 mph off of an average. When I get asked "what's your average?" when someone is considering riding with me I'll just say "I can go whatever speed you want. Let's ride." |
Originally Posted by Cypress
(Post 21235421)
You just gotta make sure your average speed is .0001 mph faster than 2nd place!
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...4d7b7df119.jpg 13.1 mph avg. speed on a flat course with no wind. 111w avg. power. And absolutely wrecked. |
Originally Posted by caloso
(Post 21235536)
Exactly. And when you start doing some focused training you'll notice that some of your hardest workouts have the lowest average speeds.
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...4d7b7df119.jpg 13.1 mph avg. speed on a flat course with no wind. 111w avg. power. And absolutely wrecked. |
The progression of TT is so freaking weird. Suffering, research, maths, money, luck, tribal knowledge, local knowledge, fear.
I'm still working on the maths, luck, and fear parts. I can suffer, and I'm an engineer. So maths, research, and small expenditures aren't problems. Now...luck, tribal knowledge, and fear......... |
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
(Post 21235574)
Sup with that cadence though? Doing SFR work? Or just tend to spin really slowly after intervals?
|
I can hold a 40+ mph average for half an hour coming down Loup Loup Pass.
|
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
(Post 21235600)
I can hold a 40+ mph average for half an hour coming down Loup Loup Pass.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...b6de4f14d9.jpg |
This forum needs a “average speed — it doesn’t matter so don’t ask about” sticky.
|
Originally Posted by blazin
(Post 21235647)
This forum needs a “average speed — it doesn’t matter so don’t ask about” sticky.
I've argued this with the moderators before, and they don't get it. Most forums require at least 10 posts to existing topics before allowing starting new ones to prevent trolls, spam, promote self help (searching), and participation in the community not expecting an immediate handout. But they won't do it. |
Originally Posted by blazin
(Post 21235647)
This forum needs a “average speed — it doesn’t matter so don’t ask about” sticky.
|
How about a "standard conditions" forum for the theoretically minded?
|
Originally Posted by Cypress
(Post 21235638)
Even for estimated, that is impressive wattage down a 6% grade at that speed! Did you have that 70t chainring? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.