Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Classic & Vintage (https://www.bikeforums.net/forumdisplay.php?f=181)
-   -   C-Record Crank w/ "21" date code? 1985 Amsted Gold Race edition? (https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=855014)

bike recyclery 10-29-12 09:36 AM

C-Record Crank w/ "21" date code? 1985 Amsted Gold Race edition?
 
3 Attachment(s)
I pulled this sweet c-record off an 80's Guerciotti carbon/alloy bonded bike. The date code is "21" in a square. It looks like an 84-87 model with the 7mm self extracting bolts and engraved shield logo. In the thread in the link below, Lotek said the 21 referred to a special Dutch Amsted Gold Race edition produced for only one week. Does anyone have any more info on this crank?

http://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in.../t-339780.html

http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=280954http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=280955http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=280956

vjp 10-29-12 09:53 AM

Amstel Gold Race not Amsted, and his post was a joke.

bike recyclery 10-29-12 09:56 AM


Originally Posted by vjp (Post 14891359)
Amstel Gold Race not Amsted, and his post was a joke.

Couldn't quite tell, but that makes sense! In that case, does anyone know what the 21 stands for?

repechage 10-29-12 10:34 AM


Originally Posted by bike recyclery (Post 14891382)
Couldn't quite tell, but that makes sense! In that case, does anyone know what the 21 stands for?

21 is a date code, or probably better stated a "batch" code. This was during the dark days where demand for Campagnolo fell off a cliff. Shimano 7400 was pushing Campagnolo to the side.
'86-'88 is a good period for these. Distributors had much on hand and unlike bread, did not have to rotate stock so vigorously.
You will also find 31 in a square, and 11 in a square.

repechage 10-29-12 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by bike recyclery (Post 14891382)
Couldn't quite tell, but that makes sense! In that case, does anyone know what the 21 stands for?

21 is a date code, or probably better stated a "batch" code. This was during the dark days where demand for Campagnolo fell off a cliff. Shimano 7400 was pushing Campagnolo to the side.
'86 or a bit beyond is a good period for these. Note the stamped logo on the arms, earlier version. Distributors had much on hand and unlike bread, did not have to rotate stock so vigorously.
You will also find 31 in a square, and 11 in a square.

Ex Pres 10-29-12 10:39 AM

21 = 1986

cudak888 10-29-12 10:57 AM


Originally Posted by Ex Pres (Post 14891610)
21 = 1986

Unlikely, given the engraved '84-only logos. Don't trust the charts for these codes.

-Kurt

repechage 10-29-12 11:41 AM


Originally Posted by cudak888 (Post 14891694)
Unlikely, given the engraved '84-only logos. Don't trust the charts for these codes.

-Kurt

I don't think the "engraved" or rather stamped arm shield logos are 1984 only. But they are the initial style. The placement moved too, but I never fully tracked when.
States one who has a pair with a 4 in a circle.

10speedterror 10-29-12 01:13 PM

how bout a 61 in a square with a printed shield?


not to hijack the thread

Ex Pres 10-29-12 01:23 PM


Originally Posted by 10speedterror (Post 14892334)
how bout a 61 in a square with a printed shield?

If the charts are to be believed (Kurt says don't always), and follows the earlier pattern, 61 should be 1990. Does that fit with the component in question?

callig 10-29-12 06:06 PM

I bought a c-record crank with 11 in a square off e-bay about 2 months ago

kenhawkeye 11-05-12 05:10 AM


Originally Posted by Ex Pres (Post 14891610)
21 = 1986


On Super Record, 11 in a square was definitely 1985 but not sure if the code applied to "C" Record as well as SR

miamijim 11-05-12 07:24 AM

How about this set with an '11', I think these are the true 1st gen C Record crankset. The RD is from the same group.

http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/r...3/DSC01588.jpg

http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/r...3/DSC01591.jpg

http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/r...4/DSC01817.jpg

callig 11-05-12 01:57 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Wow you got the original anodized finish off yours, mine looks like this with a 7mm extractorhttp://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=282159

Andycapp 11-05-12 03:14 PM

Hmmm, how about a "42" in a square, printed logo? '88?

10speedterror 11-05-12 06:56 PM


Originally Posted by Ex Pres (Post 14892383)
If the charts are to be believed (Kurt says don't always), and follows the earlier pattern, 61 should be 1990. Does that fit with the component in question?

i think that would fit nicely mine are also C record


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.