Help with shoe selection
Time to buy some cycling shoes. I favor the mountain bike variety, with the recessed cleats and friendly to walking. On multiple day long distance events, I have had some real problems with small toe metatarsal on my bad foot. I have a wide foot and sources have suggested Lake brand shoes. A lot of different options to sort through, as I look at their website. An actual store is several hundred miles away, so it will be purchase online I'm afraid. So I'm looking for some guidance from those of you that know and have found some good shoes that fit the bill. I'm open to other brands/options also. Thanks in advance.
|
Buy up a size too, you don't want the front of the shoe anywhere near your toes.
|
Originally Posted by unterhausen
(Post 21423869)
Buy up a size too, you don't want the front of the shoe anywhere near your toes.
|
I find 2E to 4E most comfortable and bought an online Lake shoe of the ATB variant about 10 yrs ago. It was styled
as extra wide and fits fine, though as noted a larger size is still helpful and this allows a gel insert that improves comfort on longer rides. For warm weather cycling sandals completely solve the width problem and include lots of velcro style size adjustments. Shoes are worse than saddles in terms of fit, as what is fine for 100k may be pretty awful after 300 miles. For what little it is worth, my US shoe size is 10 or 10.5, nominally Euro 43, but a Shimano 43 was awful after 30-40 miles. Replaced with Shimano ATB in 46, fit fine, and the Lakes are 45W. Both of the larger are a bit longish but not too much and the insert helps a lot. I find long walks with a backpack result in modest hand swelling and I suspect the same thing happens with feet on longer rides (centrifugal forces?) |
Originally Posted by sch
(Post 21424230)
I find 2E to 4E most comfortable and bought an online Lake shoe of the ATB variant about 10 yrs ago. It was styled
as extra wide and fits fine, though as noted a larger size is still helpful and this allows a gel insert that improves comfort on longer rides. For warm weather cycling sandals completely solve the width problem and include lots of velcro style size adjustments. Shoes are worse than saddles in terms of fit, as what is fine for 100k may be pretty awful after 300 miles. For what little it is worth, my US shoe size is 10 or 10.5, nominally Euro 43, but a Shimano 43 was awful after 30-40 miles. Replaced with Shimano ATB in 46, fit fine, and the Lakes are 45W. Both of the larger are a bit longish but not too much and the insert helps a lot. I find long walks with a backpack result in modest hand swelling and I suspect the same thing happens with feet on longer rides (centrifugal forces?) |
I use dominators, but I don't think they are good for wide feet. A friend of mine switched to lakes when his feet got too wide for his dominators. If you go to their website, they have a great fit matrix and sizing chart to help find the right shoes.
|
My feet shrink during long rides. I think it's because I'm not standing on them. I'll have to reach down and ratchet a little after a couple hours.
|
that would be nice, my feet expand at about 95 miles. I have some really nice shoes that I don't use on long rides anymore because of that. I think shrinking is a definite outlier.
|
I found out Lake sizing guide to be spot on: https://lakecycling.com/pages/sizing-charts
But I didn't follow their "add 5mm to your actual length measurement to get recommended size" recommendation - just directly selected the size according to the length I've measured. It turned out their regular width MX 238 was wide enough for me, I didn't need to order the wide size. For comparison, in Shimano shoes I've not only needed wide but also a full size up. |
Originally Posted by Oso Polar
(Post 21425795)
I found out Lake sizing guide to be spot on: https://lakecycling.com/pages/sizing-charts
But I didn't follow their "add 5mm to your actual length measurement to get recommended size" recommendation - just directly selected the size according to the length I've measured. It turned out their regular width MX 238 was wide enough for me, I didn't need to order the wide size. For comparison, in Shimano shoes I've not only needed wide but also a full size up. |
100 miles will be a good ride for me. I've never ridden 400 km in one day. Yet. ;-)
Also, same as Carbonfiberboy, I usually find that after some time riding, shoes become a bit more loose and I need to slightly tighten them. I'm not sure why - are feet shrinking or shoes stretching (due to leather warming up?) - but this happens... Anyway, they recommend to add 5 mm to the measured foot length, not to the width. I don't think that even if feet swell they become noticeably longer. So, I just measured the feet as they say and then selected the size with matching length range. It also matched the feet width I've measured in standard width: 104 mm for size 45 - I've measured 103 for one foot and 105 for another. Wide shoes at the same size 45 are listed as 116 mm wide - this would have been way too wide. |
Originally Posted by Oso Polar
(Post 21426564)
Anyway, they recommend to add 5 mm to the measured foot length, not to the width. I don't think that even if feet swell they become noticeably longer. So, I just measured the feet as they say and then selected the size with matching length range. It also matched the feet width I've measured in standard width: 104 mm for size 45 - I've measured 103 for one foot and 105 for another. Wide shoes at the same size 45 are listed as 116 mm wide - this would have been way too wide.
|
Specialized shoes work for me
I find Specialized brand shoes to have a very comfortable toe box. I went with their mid-level cross country mtn bike shoe with shimano spd cleats as my multipurpose shoe for touring and randonneuring. It has a good stiffness and enough volume for my wide flat feet. I use their body geometry foot beds too. I have the worst luck buying shoes online. I need to just start buying 2 different sizes and send one back. I never get it right first try. Giro shoes run awfully small in my experience. Specialized have more room to accomodate inserts and larger "high volume" feet. The boa closure system is easy to adjust on the fly and keeps a low profile. Good luck and let us know what you end up figuring out.
|
Originally Posted by ROT_01
(Post 21427742)
I find Specialized brand shoes to have a very comfortable toe box. I went with their mid-level cross country mtn bike shoe with shimano spd cleats as my multipurpose shoe for touring and randonneuring. It has a good stiffness and enough volume for my wide flat feet. I use their body geometry foot beds too. I have the worst luck buying shoes online. I need to just start buying 2 different sizes and send one back. I never get it right first try. Giro shoes run awfully small in my experience. Specialized have more room to accomodate inserts and larger "high volume" feet. The boa closure system is easy to adjust on the fly and keeps a low profile. Good luck and let us know what you end up figuring out.
|
Originally Posted by gif4445
(Post 21425009)
My measurements would get me in a Euro 44-44.5 (11-11.5), with a 110 mm width.
Are they more toward the flatter side of things? Narrow heel? or not? |
Originally Posted by tangerineowl
(Post 21430398)
What length are your feet in mm?
Are they more toward the flatter side of things? Narrow heel? or not? |
Originally Posted by gif4445
(Post 21430454)
My longest foot is 275 mm. Adding the 5 mm that Lake suggests, gets me to 280. I also measured my custom inserts and they are 290 mm. First time I ever measured them. No wonder I struggle to get them in a shoe and might trim them a little. I have high arches and did suffer from Plantar fasciitis, thus the custom insoles. Good question on the heel. Haven't measured them, but they are relatively narrow compared to the width of the widest area of my foot.
I'm 270mm length, with 111/113 width, but flatter feet and pretty narrow heel. 43cm in the old S-Works mtb 6 fits me very well after a little breaking in. Couple of mm or so gap at the front. Ignoring $$$ for the moment :) the Specialized Recon 3 in a 43.5 or 44? might work as the heel in that model tends to suit a wider range. In addition there is more height in the toebox (and subsequently along the length of the shoe?) than the 6. I mainly thought of it as an option as the carbon sole has their stiffness rating of 10, but the big plus is there is built in flex forward of the cleat (helps when walking around a bit). The Recon 2 only has their stiffness rating of 6.0. |
Originally Posted by gif4445
(Post 21426791)
what model of shoe did you get? I'm trying to sort through all that they offer.
|
Keen cycling shoes are the perfect solution with their very wide toe box section and super comfortable soles. I used to wear them but switched to Dromartis as I do not need anything special, but if you have worn Keens in regular footwear you will know what to expect in their cycling shoes. Just buy your normal size, no mis-sizing needed to get the extra room you need.
|
Originally Posted by Oso Polar
(Post 21436662)
mx 238.
|
Originally Posted by tangerineowl
(Post 21430500)
Was asking; thinking also about Specialized options.
I'm 270mm length, with 111/113 width, but flatter feet and pretty narrow heel. 43cm in the old S-Works mtb 6 fits me very well after a little breaking in. Couple of mm or so gap at the front. Ignoring $$$ for the moment :) the Specialized Recon 3 in a 43.5 or 44? might work as the heel in that model tends to suit a wider range. In addition there is more height in the toebox (and subsequently along the length of the shoe?) than the 6. I mainly thought of it as an option as the carbon sole has their stiffness rating of 10, but the big plus is there is built in flex forward of the cleat (helps when walking around a bit). The Recon 2 only has their stiffness rating of 6.0. |
Originally Posted by gif4445
(Post 21437788)
I talked to the LBS, a Specialized dealer. He said the challenge was Specialized limited number of options in a wide shoe. Whereas Lake as numerous options. I do plan to stop there anyway and try on the one or two possibly, that they have. Thanks!
Good luck. |
Originally Posted by tangerineowl
(Post 21438960)
Note my 112mm width fits the 'standard' width Specialized mtb 6 / Recon.
Good luck. |
Originally Posted by gif4445
(Post 21456518)
Can you clarify the Recon model? I only see Recon 1, 2, 3 and S-works in a mountain bike shoe.
This model as it has the stiffer sole combined with front flex. |
I just bought Lake's 238 love them
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:41 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.