Buying advice for a casual cyclist
 

Hello there,

I'm new here and looking for buying advice.

I'm a casual cyclist, cycling for 2-3 times a week, mostly getting myself a bit of cardio and R&R in the process.
My old trustworthy Scott broke down, so here I am.

Looked a bit for a simple bicycle, and narrowed it down to two choices:
(I'm sorry a space between goo.gl, forum rules)

goo .gl/uh597F - Radial Compel 1.1 Hybrid
OR
goo .gl/G26eTM Spyder Rogue 1.0

I'm looking for as good as possible simple, sturdy and comfortable bicycle for my casual needs.
Don't need anything fancy (I think these variants from which I choose is somewhat entry type), though I'll be going through different terrains - road and off-road(some gravel, but nothing too rough).

Could you pinpoint me from the bikes I've chosen, which would be better for my needs?
I'm a total n00b, I just did a bit of research of technology both bikes are using, Radial seems to have upper hand, but I might be wrong.

Please help me out!

Thanks!

I don't know what those two bikes are, but a bicycle is a pretty simple machine.

I wouldn't over think it. A relatively simple, functional bike will handle a much greater range of conditions than you are probably envisioning. With the kind of care and maintenance that the average adult gives their possessions it will last for a long time. If, for whatever reason, you find it inadequate for your purpose, a basic bike is always relatively easy to sell and you can buy a replacement that suits you better.

I simply wouldn't buy a cyclist, casual or otherwise. i wouldn't even know where they were sold.

More helpfully .... please tell us what year and model of Scott, and how far/what sort of road/offroad you like to ride.

Alos, links can be posted using a simple work-around---http://XXXXsomesite.xxxxnet/XXXXmodel/XXXXspecifics ....... that sort of thing

Thanks for your input guys.

About my old Scott...I don't quite remember, it was bought new almost 12 years ago, it was simple, one the cheapest models back then.
I liked it, but I'm not basing my purchase on that bike.
I usually cycle for around 30-45 minutes, never really paid attention for exact distance.
It's mainly road and some offroad with a bit of gravel and small rocks. That's it.

Yes, I might be overthinking, it's just a basic bike I'm looking for, but since Radial one is only 30Euros (around 40$) more expensive, I just want to get a better variant (I know it might sound funny).
By what I mean better - I'm not even remotely skilled enough to compare these two in terms of frame, fork, gears, tyres and whatsoever, the technology it's using.
I might be asking too much, but could you tell, which one would be better by specs?

The reason is, again, I'm planning to use it for a long time, and since the price difference is very measly, I would just like to know which one of them would be better(again, it's sounds funny, as it's for casual, but if you could help, it would be great).

Links, links ... we don't have the specs of every bike sold in every nation memorized. :) (Well, I don't ... some posters here, I wouldn't be surprised.)

Was your old bike adequet for your needs? If yes, then make a note of what you liked, didn't like, & some basic specs like frame size, gears, etc...and go shopping. New SORA equipment is every bit as good as the higher end stuff of a decade ago so don't get too hung up on "It's GOTTA be 105 or you'll wish you got better" type recommendations.

Lots of deals to be had on decent bikes in the sub $900 range at most bike shops.

In short, buy what fits & has a good range of gears for the terrain you ride. In Seattle there is many a 700c road bike that has a 50-34 chain ring & 11-32 cassette. That's about 30 to about 110 gear inches. That works for our terrain. If buying a new bike, you might ask if the shop will change to the gears you want right from the get-go.

Good luck.

Sorry for that!
Links:
goo .gl/uh597F - Radial Compel 1.1 Hybrid
OR
goo .gl/G26eTM Spyder Rogue 1.0

Just remove space before .gl

Specs in text format:

Spyder Rogue 1.0

> 650B Alloy Hardtail Mountain Bike Frame
> SR Suntour XCM RL 100mm Suspension Fork
> Alloy MTB Handlebars
> Alloy Handlebar Stem
> 3x8 Shimano Altus/Acera gears
> Shimano Chainset
> Shimano M315 Hydraulic Disc Brakes
> 650B Alex Rims on Shimano Hubs


Radial Compel 1.1 Hybrid
Somehow HTML screws up specs formatting for this one, I'll just attach a .txt doc, sorry.

Thanks so much for your help!

Thanks for your input, but my old Scott was badly damaged in an accident, and I just threw it away.
I don't recall any of those specs(no, my brain wasn't damaged in an accident, lol, or maybe?), it was just a simple standard bike I guess, bought around 12 years ago.
I never paid attention to that stuff, honestly, even the most basic things. Bike was working, and that I was all I cared for.
Just the stuff I need I posted in the first post.

Radial Compel 1.1 Hybrid Bike
Buy Radial Compel 1.1 Hybrid Bike | Radial Cycles | Radial Cycles
basic Al frame/CF fork flat bar road/trail bike
50/34x12-28 Sora—very nice
Shimano Hollowtech BB—very nice
35 mm tires—good for comfort and the variety of terrain the OP mentioned
Mech discs, no brand …. Ummmmmmm

Out Of Stock (it claims)

British bike, so it is set up to ride on the wrong side of the road. 

Spyder Rogue 1.0 Mens
https://lt.sportsdirect.com/spyder-r...lcode=93205603
650B Alloy Hardtail Mountain Bike Frame
SR Suntour XCM RL 100mm Suspension Fork——exceedingly meh
3x8 Shimano Altus/Acera gears—meh … certainly good enough but …..
Also doesn’t list ratios
Shimano M315 Hydraulic Disc Brakes Good
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally i would go with the rigid fork Radial .... the Suntour fork on the Rogue is excess weight and limited function, and unless you are planning to actually ride hard over big obstacles, i don't see where it would help. With 35-mm tires (and bigger might fit) you could ride over or through any light sand/gravel/packed earth trails with comfort and control, and when you were on pavement, would have more predictable steering and a lighter bike ... and I'd wager that fork would either hardly ever get used, in which case it is an expensive waste, or would get used hard and die pretty quickly ....

If you need a mountian bike, you need to spend a little more up front ... or a lot more down the road.

if you need a gravel bike which can handle pavement well, the Radial suits the need.

IMO.

I agree. The well damped suspension forks on the more expensive mountain bikes really do make a world of difference. The low end spring forks on lower end offerings are more show than performance. If you have a limited budget, spending part of that budget for a feature that doesn't really do very much doesn't make sense to me.

Thank you very much for such detailed reply Sir!!!

Going to order Radial. :)

OffLine.. Bene Sugg...
 

Simple; Walk into your neighborhood bike shop and test ride bikes they sell ..

Thanks for your input!

My guess (I don't ride this style of bike) is that the Spyder with 650B wheels and front suspension is aimed for more offroad but can do OK on the road, while the Radial I assume is a 700C wheel and rigid fork probably aimed mainly for road but can do OK offroad. If hills are an issue you probably find the Spyder a bit easier going up, due to lower gearing.

scott s.
.

The old scott broke down. What is wrong with it? Flat tire, broken frame, wheels shot, or just everything.

Since you say that you don't know much about bikes, A few parts might have your old bike back up and running.