Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Touring (https://www.bikeforums.net/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   Why is ultralight touring so unpopular? (https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=1037386)

staehpj1 11-06-15 06:32 AM


Originally Posted by elcruxio (Post 18298408)
Good air pillows weigh in the region of 50 grams and take next to no space at all. I see no point in not having one since the added comfort is immense.

I also carry a pillow. Mine weighs all of 3 ounces. I find it much more comfortable than a bunch of clothes in a stuff sack. My down vest, sweater, or jacket all make a nice pillow and might be along on some trips, but I may also want to use them for extra insulation on an extra cold night. I find that if I am willing to go really bare bones I can get below 10 pounds, but even then I find that 3 ounce pillow worth taking along. I also take a very comfortable sleeping pad. My goal is to go light, but I insist on being comfortable as well.

BTW, as I start to get my list down to around ~10 pounds I usually decide that striving to cut those last ounces isn't worth the effort. I have made backpacking lists for gear weights under 10 pounds that would be adequate and reasonable comfortable, but at that point typically wind up deciding to splurge on a fly rod or a musical instrument, or some other item.

DCwom 11-06-15 06:36 AM


Originally Posted by Happy Feet (Post 18297923)
Some people are into ultra light credit card touring. I see that all the time.

+1
We would never tour any other way than CC, to each its own. Given the number of touring cyclists to the number of bicycles in the world, one could ask why touring is unpopular, or given the number of cars why is cycling so unpopular? Its all relative.

andrewclaus 11-06-15 06:46 AM

I'm an ultralight bike tourist and hiker and I've actually experienced scorn from others about my methods. Those really stick out in my mind. But by far most are happy and secure with what they carry and don't really care. A few are interested and question how it's done.

To answer the OP, I think most people just pack for the trip they want to experience. Many want to go on a camping trip (and enjoy outdoor cooking and living), or a bird-watching trip, or a photography/blogging trip. A few just want to go on a bicycling trip, and so they pack nothing that does not support the bicycling.

It seems to be a universal truth that no matter how much you carry, everyone who carries more than you is an overweight dinosaur, and everyone who carries less than you is a risk-taking fool.

indyfabz 11-06-15 06:54 AM


Originally Posted by Buffalo Buff (Post 18298147)
Extra pillow? :lol: who brings even one pillow? Rolled up jacket is just as good.

I sometimes do. Weighs a grand total of 4 oz. Maybe a rolled up jacket is good enough for you. To each is own.

elcruxio 11-06-15 07:38 AM


Originally Posted by MassiveD (Post 18298416)
- Or the tarpmasters who's ringleader recently got lime disease for lack of a few ounces of netting, and now sleeps under a "tarp" that looks a lot like a tent.

- Or the hammock crowd who get a dozen hammocks, then confess they never actually slept through a night in one.

- Or the guys with the alcohol stoves that heat up cups of boiling water all the time, as though it were a satisfying tub of chicken.

I have to point out a few things here.

Tarps combined with hammocs are probably the best sleeping system for the solo tourist. If I go out with the SO I use a tent but alone and I use a hammock (except if I go north where there's no trees...) I've had some of my best sleep in a hammock in sub freezing no less. It's just a matter of setting up really. And one needs to have a underblanket. Using a sleeping pad is a method doomed to fail. So you need 4 components (5 if going out in bug season)
1) hammock
2) tarp
3) underblanket
4) sleeping bag
5) Bug net
6) optional pillow, although in a hammock it's not nearly as important as with pad on the ground.
Didn't say it was going to be ultralight, but then again that whole system is lighter than a good (quality and size) tent.

And about alcohol stoves.
Trangia is probably the best cooking system ever made and it uses alcohol. Sure you can use it with gas or multi fuel, but the alcohol really is good enough and unlike some say, works in as cold a weather as you need it to work.
Couple that with a woodgas stove and you have a really heavy / bulky system that won't let you down, anywhere, ever. At least, I'm having trouble imagining touring environments that have neither plants or alcohol.

Still trying to figure out how I'm going to solve my current dilemma though... I want to use the woodgas stove with my stainless pot primarily, but also want to have the trangia alcohol burningn capability as a backup. But taking both systems would be way too heavy and bulky. And I'd still be without a windscreen for the woodgas stove. So maybe a pot from the trangia, the steel pot, the woodgas stove, trangia burner, windscreen (those foldable things) and a tripod to hold the steel pot...

bmike 11-06-15 07:57 AM


Originally Posted by MassiveD (Post 18298416)
A thing I find annoying about the lightweight crowd, is there is so much bad advice:

- Born on third base, think they hit a triple. You get some nonsense road bike recommendation from someone who is riding tires thinner than they ride in today's peloton, and not enough spokes for a game of pick up sticks. No not a lightweight genius, just a little person, or maybe someone about to have a wheel collapse.

- All the Bikepacking nonsense. Yes if you fill your bike with an unlimited number of bags, you won't pack too much stuff because it got crowded out by the bags, or there is no point since you will never find it.

- Or the tarpmasters who's ringleader recently got lime disease for lack of a few ounces of netting, and now sleeps under a "tarp" that looks a lot like a tent.

- Or the hammock crowd who get a dozen hammocks, then confess they never actually slept through a night in one.

- Or the guys with the alcohol stoves that heat up cups of boiling water all the time, as though it were a satisfying tub of chicken.

It's un-American. Who wants to run into an emaciated squirrel chattering on about the last few ounces he saved, who disappears from sight every time he turns sideways. I want to camp next to cheerleaders in ultralight outfits, with big hair, and a 2 stroke Margarita mixer.

Last time I checked America was the land of the free and home of the brave.


But your sexist ending sentence sums up some parts of America quite accurately. But I think those thoughts fit better with a cheep beer, big game and pickup truck commercial than a bike touring forum. You are free to carry your margarita maker any way you want. I can carry my stuff in one hundred bags of I want. Or panniers. Or a trailer. It's all good. That's what's great about freedom and first world problems.


I won't be camping nearby. I'll be cowering in the rain under a bridge with my ultralight tent looking through my bikepacking bags for my cut down toothbrush and wishing I had brought my RV instead.

mdilthey 11-06-15 08:08 AM

I got into ultralight touring because it was enabling. I could go further, see more, do more. I wasn't very strong three years ago when I went on my first UL tour, and the decreased weight helped me keep up with the team pace of 80+ miles per day. Now, I can easily push 100 on repeat and that means I can take my long weekend, and visit Canada instead of the local forest.

Ultralight isn't about restriction, it's about freedom. The bikepackers are chasing a different rabbit than you are; don't confuse that for chasing your rabbit the wrong way.

saddlesores 11-06-15 08:19 AM


Originally Posted by elcruxio (Post 18298635)
I have to point out a few things here.

Tarps combined with hammocs are probably the best sleeping system for the solo tourist...

no. what you mean is hammocks are the best system for YOU.

saddlesores 11-06-15 08:21 AM


Originally Posted by bmike (Post 18298676)
But your sexist ending sentence sums up some parts of America quite accurately.

who's the sexist here? what, boys can't be cheerleaders?

bmike 11-06-15 08:24 AM


Originally Posted by saddlesores (Post 18298735)
who's the sexist here? what, boys can't be cheerleaders?

I never specified a gender.
;)

Objectifying random strangers is lame regardless.

indyfabz 11-06-15 08:30 AM


Originally Posted by MassiveD (Post 18298416)
A thing I find annoying about the lightweight crowd, is there is so much bad advice:

- Born on third base, think they hit a triple. You get some nonsense road bike recommendation from someone who is riding tires thinner than they ride in today's peloton, and not enough spokes for a game of pick up sticks. No not a lightweight genius, just a little person, or maybe someone about to have a wheel collapse.

- All the Bikepacking nonsense. Yes if you fill your bike with an unlimited number of bags, you won't pack too much stuff because it got crowded out by the bags, or there is no point since you will never find it.

- Or the tarpmasters who's ringleader recently got lime disease for lack of a few ounces of netting, and now sleeps under a "tarp" that looks a lot like a tent.

- Or the hammock crowd who get a dozen hammocks, then confess they never actually slept through a night in one.

- Or the guys with the alcohol stoves that heat up cups of boiling water all the time, as though it were a satisfying tub of chicken.

It's un-American. Who wants to run into an emaciated squirrel chattering on about the last few ounces he saved, who disappears from sight every time he turns sideways. I want to camp next to cheerleaders in ultralight outfits, with big hair, and a 2 stroke Margarita mixer.

is there a BF post hall of fame?

fietsbob 11-06-15 08:32 AM

Why does it have to Be Popular for you to decide to do it that way or Not?

<Its going to be a Long winter so this will be argued over till Spring and people can Ride again>


This is not the center of the Universe not Everyone reads this forum .

FWIW transamerica race , last June, the bikepacking kit was the most common, amongst the 40 competitors.

Buffalo Buff 11-06-15 09:16 AM


Originally Posted by saddlesores (Post 18298401)
it's not that ultralight is unpopular, it's the evangelists that push it often come
off as asshat bible thumpers. they've seen the light, and anyone that doesn't
have a personal relationship with their seatpack is going to burn in hell for
all eternity.

I see this sentiment expressed a lot in touring and backpacking forums but I've never seen one of these types tbh.

Happy Feet 11-06-15 09:20 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by mdilthey (Post 18298696)
...and the decreased weight helped me keep up with the team pace of 80+ miles per day. Now, I can easily push 100 on repeat


Originally Posted by fietsbob (Post 18298760)
FWIW transamerica race , last June, the bikepacking kit was the most common, amongst the 40 competitors.

I think this goes along with what I said about traditional methods being good enough until you can't do what you want to do with what you have. Most people aren't in a race or keeping up with a team when they tour. Probably, they are trying to do exactly the opposite and detach from the rat race.

To each their own.

http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=486492

bmike 11-06-15 09:32 AM

Touring: lots of ways to do it. Massive RV style, truck camping style, expedition camping style, car camping, motorcycle camping style... vintage!
Aside from being scared when an elderly couple pass me in a vehicle larger than my house, its all good though.
Same goes for bike touring...

http://www.snappytint.com/wp-content...2013/04/rv.jpg

http://www.big-sur-lodging.com/Big-S...psite-01md.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AgUPreIN_z...uck-camper.jpg

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...8336ffc9fc.jpg

https://chivethethrottle.files.wordp...pg?w=500&h=666

http://cdn.gearpatrol.com/wp-content...ol-Slide-1.jpg

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...2ff57812a4.jpg

http://www.theridingobsession.com/wp...er-760x360.png

BigAura 11-06-15 10:06 AM


Originally Posted by MassiveD (Post 18298414)
One is that, real ultralite tourists can't be separated from people with a daypack strapped to their bikes. How do you know that guy isn't just on his way home? Sure he could be some place that is extremely remote/touristy, but then how does one know he isn't just out for a day or two.

To be honest I don't think you'll confuse this rig with someone going to the office. Granted I don't know anything about his trip plans by looking at his bike but assuming that he's on some kind of tour seems reasonable. If I see someone on the road like this I'm usually interested in chatting to learn more.

http://www.bikeforums.net/attachment...p;d=1346337061
source (nun): http://www.bikeforums.net/touring/84...vangelism.html

fuzz2050 11-06-15 10:10 AM


Originally Posted by staehpj1 (Post 18298510)
There is some truth to that but it isn't that hard to get down to 20 pounds with inexpensive gear. Also if you have way fewer items you can afford to spend a bit more on each one.

The easiest way by far to shed weight is to simply not bring things. Most people can probably save more weight by geekily going through all of their gear on a spreadsheet and thinking "do I really need this" than by spending hundreds of dollars on a new, lighter thing.

ricebowl 11-06-15 10:14 AM

strike one...:p

Originally Posted by Buffalo Buff (Post 18298147)

who brings even one pillow? Rolled up jacket is just as good.
.


staehpj1 11-06-15 10:16 AM


Originally Posted by fuzz2050 (Post 18299045)
The easiest way by far to shed weight is to simply not bring things. Most people can probably save more weight by geekily going through all of their gear on a spreadsheet and thinking "do I really need this" than by spending hundreds of dollars on a new, lighter thing.

Absolutely. I think that one of the most irrational things some folks do is to buy expensive items to shed a few grams when they are carrying quite a few pounds of extra items.

mdilthey 11-06-15 10:37 AM


Originally Posted by Happy Feet (Post 18298910)
I think this goes along with what I said about traditional methods being good enough until you can't do what you want to do with what you have. Most people aren't in a race or keeping up with a team when they tour. Probably, they are trying to do exactly the opposite and detach from the rat race.

To each their own.

http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=486492

Not everyone starts at Four Ortliebs. My first tour, I had less than 10lbs of stuff in a drybag strapped to my rack. Hammock tent, sleeping bag, air pad, and a few clothing items, not much else.

A few college kids from my local shop did trans-america over the summer. Not one person had more than two panniers. No handlebar bags, LOTS of framebags- just about everyone had a framebag or two. Maybe, with the advent of new materials, the "ultralight" setup is becoming less radical.

Online communities are usually defined by ~10-15 "frequent posters" (oh god, am I one of them?!). The "norm" on this forum may or may not be the nationwide norm. Hard to say with ultralight touring. Like the backpacking community, many of the bikepackers prefer not to spend time at their computers.

rekmeyata 11-06-15 10:58 AM

I just saw a guy yesterday on a Trek Madone CF racing bike with a HUGE pack pack on, I don't know how far that guy was going but better him than me! That backpack was so full it had to be at least 50 pounds of gear not including the rolled up tent and sleeping bag attached.

bmike 11-06-15 10:58 AM

5 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by mdilthey (Post 18299118)

Online communities are usually defined by ~10-15 "frequent posters" (oh god, am I one of them?!). The "norm" on this forum may or may not be the nationwide norm. Hard to say with ultralight touring. Like the backpacking community, many of the bikepackers prefer not to spend time at their computers.

Don't be too hard on yourself!

http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=486510
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=486511
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=486512
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=486513
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=486514

I'm going to start a thread... ultralight posting!

cyccommute 11-06-15 11:06 AM


Originally Posted by saddlesores (Post 18298401)
it's not that ultralight is unpopular, it's the evangelists that push it often come
off as asshat bible thumpers. they've seen the light, and anyone that doesn't
have a personal relationship with their seatpack is going to burn in hell for
all eternity.

Kind of sums it up nicely:thumb:


Originally Posted by MassiveD (Post 18298416)
A thing I find annoying about the lightweight crowd, is there is so much bad advice:

- Born on third base, think they hit a triple. You get some nonsense road bike recommendation from someone who is riding tires thinner than they ride in today's peloton, and not enough spokes for a game of pick up sticks. No not a lightweight genius, just a little person, or maybe someone about to have a wheel collapse.

- All the Bikepacking nonsense. Yes if you fill your bike with an unlimited number of bags, you won't pack too much stuff because it got crowded out by the bags, or there is no point since you will never find it.

- Or the tarpmasters who's ringleader recently got lime disease for lack of a few ounces of netting, and now sleeps under a "tarp" that looks a lot like a tent.

- Or the hammock crowd who get a dozen hammocks, then confess they never actually slept through a night in one.

- Or the guys with the alcohol stoves that heat up cups of boiling water all the time, as though it were a satisfying tub of chicken.

It's un-American. Who wants to run into an emaciated squirrel chattering on about the last few ounces he saved, who disappears from sight every time he turns sideways. I want to camp next to cheerleaders in ultralight outfits, with big hair, and a 2 stroke Margarita mixer.

Surprise! Surprise! Surprise! There's some things here that I can actually agree with. I'm not interested in being a test lab for mosquito genetics, so I carry a bit more weight to keep me from being completely drained of blood. Sometimes, I need to cook because there isn't always a restaurant close by. The one thing you missed was what happens to the ultralight crowd when temperature drop. More below.


Originally Posted by Buffalo Buff (Post 18298167)
I don't bother with cooking supplies, I have no interest in it. I'd rather just snack on clif bars etc. like you, and grab a meal from a local restaurant once a day or so. I'd rather try new foods and ****, stuff I can't get made the same way at home, than boil some ramen noodles or something. There were often 10-15 mile stretches where I didn't have any food on me at all, because I knew a town would be coming up soon enough. Also I prefer to eat while I ride during the day. I hate stopping to eat when I could be exploring or making progress.

Traveling through the US at a rate of ~100 miles per day, finding a place to restock is simply not an issue. When I go international I'll have to adjust my setup a bit I'm sure.

My setup for my last tour (2 weeks, 1400 miles, deep south USA sept-oct) was about 20lbs bike, 14.5lbs gear, 220lbs human. At the end it was about 20lb bike, 10lb gear, 204lb human. Mailed a bunch of stuff home I realized I didn't need.

That's the best feeling ever. Thinking you have your **** all sorted out, then you realize you have too much and can actually go lighter!

I don't know where you tour but I've toured in plenty of "civilized" parts of the US where I couldn't find food at all. Even restaurants can be difficult to find. I usually carry three days worth just in case and have used all three days before I could restock.

Your system works for you but don't assume that the rest of us have to follow your "system". I'm sure you could save some weight by removing the saddle and seatpost as well as by riding naked but how many sacrifices are you willing to make?

I'm not sure what you carry in your "14.5 lbs of gear" but I know what I carry and how I've used every bit of what I carry and could have used more. For example, I started a tour in Toledo this spring (last week of April to be precise) with some "ultralight" gear choices that made for some very uncomfortable nights for the next month. I usually carry a 0°F down bag but opted to try a much lighter bag based on previous tours where the 0°F bag was just too warm. I obtained a nice 1.5 lb 45°F bag that was totally inadequate for the first night on the banks of Lake Erie when the temperature hit 22°F. Even wearing my rain jacket, arm warmers, leg warmers, zip off pants, light jacket and extra socks, it was an incredibly uncomfortable night. Any less clothing and I'm sure it would have been unhealthy.

I had several more nights like that and even went so far as to purchase bulky (and heavy) sweat pants and sweat shirt to sleep in. I was glad for the extra room and for the extra warmth. Even as late as the last week of May, I had a night that hovered around 25°F in western Maryland. Without the extra space and extra clothes, I'm sure my trip would have been cut short long before that point.

djb 11-06-15 11:11 AM

ultralight posting--thats a gem! Good one.

Oh, that motorcycle photo with the canoe-it must be a joke because holy doodles, having ridden motorcycles in cross winds a lot, that looks like an accident waiting to happen, and reeeeeal soon. Funny shot though.

psy 11-06-15 11:24 AM

I think ultralight touring isn't as popular simply because most people like to carry more than just one or two sets of clothes, and prefer not to sleep in a bivy, under a tarp or out in the open...or GOD FORBID without a pillow:p Those are my main reasons.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.