Help me rebuild my '78 Trek TX 900
It's time for me to rebuild my '78 Trek TX 900. I robbed the parts off the original build for other bikes. Here's the problem: I've decided on the gearing and now I need to figure out the derailleurs. I'm going to use an IRD wide compact crank (46/30) with a 7 speed 12-28 Maillard freewheel. I have three options:
(1) Simplex retrofriction shifters, Campy NR front derailleur, and Campy SR rear derailleur. I'd love to get away with this but the max chain capacity on a Campy SR is 26 teeth and I've far exceeded that on this set up (32 teeth). I could try to get this to work but I suspect I won't be happy with the results, right? (2) To heck with keeping the bike campy and/or European and just run as (1) above but with a shimano crane long cage rear derailleur. It's a pretty rear derailleur and it can handle this. The problem with this set up is that if I run a crane RD, I'll be sorely tempted to pick up first gen dura ace front derailleur and downtube shifters. I was hoping not to spend xtra cash on this project. BITD of course no one would have cared if you mixed parts like this (simplex retrofriction shifters, campy NR FD, and crane RD). (2) (a) I guess I could run the long cages for a campy RD as well but it wouldn't surprise me if that crane shifts better than a campy RD retrofitted with long cages. This set up would be simplex retrofriction shifters, campy NR FD, and Campy RD with a longer cage from Soma. (3) I could run huret new success rear and front derailleur and simplex retrofiction shifters. That has a capacity of 30 teeth which will work if I change out the freewheel to 13-26 7 speed. I like this because it keeps the drivetrain European (and the parts on the bike are almost all European). I like sachs new success stuff but it's not the best RD out there. This is the sachs huret new success I'm thinking of using in option 3: Sachs-Huret New Success derailleur (47.1D) Here is the bike before I tore it down. The brakes (campagnolo nuovo record) and wheels (mavic hubs, mavic ma40 rims) are staying. I'm only changing the crank, freewheel, and derailleurs. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...cb08a008ab.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...f326a6fb5a.jpg |
Well the stuff you took off was perfect. Faced with the remaining choices, I'd pick door number 2(a).
|
|
Originally Posted by Hudson308
(Post 21378462)
Well the stuff you took off was perfect. Faced with the remaining choices, I'd pick door number 2(a).
|
You should be fine with Option #1 . I ran an SR RD on 50/34 + 12/28 (also a total of 32 teeth) on a couple of bikes and they shifted just fine, even at Eroica in the gravel and in Wisconsin on those steep hills.
Different data point but same result: ran 50/28 with a 12-28 freewheel at Coppi using Dura Ace 7400 6 speed in friction setting. That's 38 teeth and it also worked just fine. Biggest problem is getting the small/big combo right so the pulley wheel doesn't hit the big cog but judicious use of horizontal dropout position and chain tension usually takes care of that. Or you could sell me that sweet, sweet Trek 900 frame and stop worrying about it! |
Originally Posted by rccardr
(Post 21378501)
You should be fine with Option #1 . I ran an SR RD on 50/34 + 12/28 (also a total of 32 teeth) on a couple of bikes and they shifted just fine, even at Eroica in the gravel and in Wisconsin on those steep hills.
Different data point but same result: ran 50/28 with a 12-28 freewheel at Coppi using Dura Ace 7400 6 speed in friction setting. That's 38 teeth and it also worked just fine. Biggest problem is getting the small/big combo right so the pulley wheel doesn't hit the big cog but judicious use of horizontal dropout position and chain tension usually takes care of that. Or you could sell me that sweet, sweet Trek 900 frame and stop worrying about it! You're right the 46/30 crank, 12-28 freewheel (which is your old freewheel btw!) is designed for those Wisconsin hills. I wasn't sure I could get option 1 to work but I'll give it a shot. |
I take it you haven't considered a modern drivetrain? The 11-speed stuff is amazing, not because of the 11 speeds but because they've made changes to the design so they work better than anything ever.
|
Originally Posted by noglider
(Post 21378616)
I take it you haven't considered a modern drivetrain? The 11-speed stuff is amazing, not because of the 11 speeds but because they've made changes to the design so they work better than anything ever.
|
My '78 930 runs 53/39, 13-28, and the SR RD does fine, with room to spare. +1 on retrofriction, and a Campy FD. And yours must be slightly earlier than mine which has tt cable guides.
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...6b1c1da10b.jpg |
Originally Posted by jeirvine
(Post 21378688)
My '78 930 runs 53/39, 13-28, and the SR RD does fine, with room to spare. +1 on retrofriction, and a Campy FD. And yours must be slightly earlier than mine which has tt cable guides.
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...6b1c1da10b.jpg |
I miss my 930.
|
Nice bike, I’d opt for choice #1 and keep the Campy. I was able to keep the NR rd on my 77 TX900, switching to a Sunrace 12-28 freewheel, and a newer chain. Shifts as well as a NR normally does, which is not near as well as a long cage Cyclone GT would. Possibly my next upgrade.
Tim https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...cf350e6b3.jpeg |
Retrofriction shifters and the Cyclone derailleurs.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:27 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.