That bike you keep thinking you should dispose of - until you ride it again ....
I bought this old bike for reasons that elude me, then finally discovered it is a c.1974 Allegro no.76 Schweizermeister that originally was in the budget, no pix in the catalog grade C format with a P3 Stronglight headset and Weinmann 500 side pulls and probably Simplex derailleurs. Yes, it is metric gauge 531, the nicer .9-.6-.9 stuff, and yes it is nicely assembled with Bocama model 14/II lugs a and a Vagner PL crown and a George Fischer sand-cast BB - but it’s Swiss threaded. The top tube is too long. It kinda sorta duplicates/overlaps two other bikes I already have in my ranger-sports-tourer category. To make it right would require spending money that would be better served taking care of other bikes in the stable. It needs expensive T.A. chainrings or another crankset, it needs either tubulars or a decent set of 700C wheels, I would like it better with a Brooks B17, blah, blah, blah.
And then I take it out for a spin and it always happens - I come back home thinking “it wouldn’t cost THAT much to really dial this one in.” It just has the smoothest floating glide to it, it just feels so good on the road. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...76b3785da.jpeg So what’s the equivalent in YOUR fleet? Which one should you, in theory, send in but just can’t bring yourself to do so? |
No such thing, cold dead hands, etc. ;)
|
And then I take it out for a spin and it always happens - I come back home thinking “it wouldn’t cost THAT much to really dial this one in.” It just has the smoothest floating glide to it, it just feels so good on the road. |
I loved the ride of the bike -531 main tubes, nice size for me etc and I sold it anyway as it duplicated a bike I already had and spent way more to refurb and dial in :lol: and in the summer I had to make hay in the crazy market. The one thing that makes it more palatable is that I got my full asking price and they guy buying it was really happy to find it and was going to use it as his daily whereas it would have mostly sat with me as part of the too large quiver
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...96a1b44bbb.jpg 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus |
You're gonna laugh but it's my 1975 Varsity Deluxe. It's heavy (45 lbs.!), the paint's not so great and it's not worth the price of the tires on it but I truly enjoy riding it, on flat ground that is. ;)
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...911bed169a.jpg |
Originally Posted by Murray Missile
(Post 21726867)
You're gonna laugh but it's my 1975 Varsity Deluxe. It's heavy (45 lbs.!), the paint's not so great and it's not worth the price of the tires on it but I truly enjoy riding it, on flat ground that is. ;)
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...911bed169a.jpg god. |
None for me; I already got rid of the ones that make me think that way. :)
|
Even as a kid I always did a complete service before I sold a bike off... they always rode so well on that last ride... the final attempt of...
“ don’t sell me off” |
Originally Posted by polymorphself
(Post 21726941)
You probably won the thread already. 45 lbs my
god. |
Originally Posted by polymorphself
(Post 21726941)
You probably won the thread already. 45 lbs my
god. |
Thanks for reminding me not to get on the two that need to go.
|
My 92 Paramount PDG5. Multiple times. But it was my grail when I bought it. Ever so slightly too big.
|
Originally Posted by rustystrings61
(Post 21726606)
I bought this old bike for reasons that elude me, then finally discovered it is a c.1974 Allegro no.76 Schweizermeister that originally was in the budget, no pix in the catalog grade C format with a P3 Stronglight headset and Weinmann 500 side pulls and probably Simplex derailleurs. Yes, it is metric gauge 531, the nicer .9-.6-.9 stuff, and yes it is nicely assembled with Bocama model 14/II lugs a and a Vagner PL crown and a George Fischer sand-cast BB - but it’s Swiss threaded. The top tube is too long. It kinda sorta duplicates/overlaps two other bikes I already have in my ranger-sports-tourer category. To make it right would require spending money that would be better served taking care of other bikes in the stable. It needs expensive T.A. chainrings or another crankset, it needs either tubulars or a decent set of 700C wheels, I would like it better with a Brooks B17, blah, blah, blah.
And then I take it out for a spin and it always happens - I come back home thinking “it wouldn’t cost THAT much to really dial this one in.” It just has the smoothest floating glide to it, it just feels so good on the road. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...76b3785da.jpeg So what’s the equivalent in YOUR fleet? Which one should you, in theory, send in but just can’t bring yourself to do so? To make it right would require spending money that would be better served taking care of other bikes in the stable. It needs expensive T.A. chainrings or another crankset, it needs either tubulars or a decent set of 700C wheels, I would like it better with a Brooks B17, blah, blah, blah. sometimes it is good to just ride another bicycle and find out the joy of each machine. it surprised me that old C&V machines can give a unique experience even though there are 'better' machines out there. edit, i like your pedal straps too. very simple for me and love not potentially falling over with the clipless system and special shoes. |
Originally Posted by ryansu
(Post 21726650)
i loved the ride of the bike -531 main tubes, nice size for me etc and i sold it anyway as it duplicated a bike i already had and spent way more to refurb and dial in :lol: And in the summer i had to make hay in the crazy market. The one thing that makes it more palatable is that i got my full asking price and they guy buying it was really happy to find it and was going to use it as his daily whereas it would have mostly sat with me as part of the too large quiver
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...96a1b44bbb.jpg 1987 trek 520 cirrus |
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
(Post 21730884)
you sold that??!?!?! (that was in all caps- but autocorrect put the kybosh on that)
|
Originally Posted by Murray Missile
(Post 21726867)
You're gonna laugh but it's my 1975 Varsity Deluxe. It's heavy (45 lbs.!), the paint's not so great and it's not worth the price of the tires on it but I truly enjoy riding it, on flat ground that is. ;)
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...911bed169a.jpg |
I'm pretty done with this '54 Schwinn Phantom but haven't landed a local buyer yet. It rides smoothly but pushing ~50lbs with a single speed coaster hub isn't super fun...
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...19dfbd1399.jpg |
Originally Posted by Murray Missile
(Post 21726867)
You're gonna laugh but it's my 1975 Varsity Deluxe. It's heavy (45 lbs.!), the paint's not so great and it's not worth the price of the tires on it but I truly enjoy riding it, on flat ground that is. ;)
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...911bed169a.jpg It looks like it is in great shape. But that is not why you are posting in this thread, is it. There is something about these old heavy Schwinn's that make them enjoyable rides. I am getting closer on my Continental. I can't wait to ride it. |
Originally Posted by sworley
(Post 21730950)
I'm pretty done with this '54 Schwinn Phantom but haven't landed a local buyer yet. It rides smoothly but pushing ~50lbs with a single speed coaster hub isn't super fun...
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...19dfbd1399.jpg |
Originally Posted by ryansu
(Post 21730936)
Yes, all things considered I would have kept it but it was the unique intersection of; 1) a bike that was duplicated in my stable, 2) crazy market prices and 3) a need for the $$$$. And my impression from the buyer was that this would be his main ride. For me it would have spent allot of time in the spare bedroom but yes it was a sweet ride and my first ever 531 bike.
|
Originally Posted by Duo
(Post 21730824)
nice bike, the attraction to me is the simplicity of the down tube shifters. my old trek 1000 has the same thing, indexed DT shifters and just fun to ride. when i bought it initially i had buyers remorse but the bike keeps chugging along with very little maintenance vs my other road bikes.
i prefer not spending much money on these things, sure we can 'improve' them, but where i live this old bike is plenty good. it came equipped with 105 almost every thing. this year this bicycle has gotten a lot of use after the trek 1500 has needed some maintenance. sometimes it is good to just ride another bicycle and find out the joy of each machine. it surprised me that old C&V machines can give a unique experience even though there are 'better' machines out there. edit, i like your pedal straps too. very simple for me and love not potentially falling over with the clipless system and special shoes. https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...edal-love.html |
Originally Posted by Velo Mule
(Post 21731003)
Nice Varsity. That looks completely original. The fenders on it look original too, however, there are some subtle details that Schwinn had from year to year that changed. I am not up on those details. Was this a Varsity Tourist? With the chrome fenders? Also the stem is aluminum. And you have wing nuts front and rear.
It looks like it is in great shape. But that is not why you are posting in this thread, is it. There is something about these old heavy Schwinn's that make them enjoyable rides. I am getting closer on my Continental. I can't wait to ride it. |
Originally Posted by ryansu
(Post 21730936)
Yes, all things considered I would have kept it but it was the unique intersection of; 1) a bike that was duplicated in my stable, 2) crazy market prices and 3) a need for the $$$$. And my impression from the buyer was that this would be his main ride. For me it would have spent allot of time in the spare bedroom but yes it was a sweet ride and my first ever 531 bike.
|
@rustystrings61, that Allegro looks great. I wonder what magic they used to make it ride so well.
I nearly gave away or sold my 1971 Raleigh Super Course a few times. Then I rode it and thought, No way! I recently rebuilt it as an all-purpose bike suitable for gravel, touring, hauling, etc. I've been taking it out for fun rides the last couple of weeks. I don't have the pictures I took when I had acquired it. It was a wreck. It still looks like a wreck but it rides great. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...6a0c7829b6.jpg |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.