Electric speeders on the local MUP
I ride regularly on the Contra Costa Canal trail and it's perpendicular friend the Iron Horse Trail. Contra Costa County, East Bay Area, California. (whew). The last couple days I've experienced several dangerous encounters with E-things. First was a couple of young boys riding powered scooters weaving in and out of pedestrians. Schools out lets go?! They both looked to have very large batteries, maybe legal but certainly not legal behavior. Next was another young man who sped past me on a fat bike with tons of power and no apparent need to pedal as he sped past. Third, a middle aged man who maybe could have pedaled but instead just zoomed up the slight hill into and through the tunnel under I680. Two other E bikes passed me at speed. I know there are so many people saying they are just keeping up with their age and blah blah blah. But I don't ride to be on a motorcycle track. This is now out of control and I'm sick out it.. Incidents have be reported to the EBRPD. Regards.
|
Originally Posted by Joe Bikerider
(Post 20979361)
I know there are so many people saying they are just keeping up with their age and blah blah blah. But I don't ride to be on a motorcycle track. This is now out of control and I'm sick out it..
But while electric motorcycles are a great idea as a replacement for the internal combustion variety, there's going to have to be a reckoning about the difference between "bicycles" and "motorcycles". Probably, things that can use bike infrastructure need to be legally required to have firmware limiting them to pedal cycling speeds; not athletic cyclist speeds, but average person speeds. Otherwise it isn't about leveling the playing field; it's about taking over the cycling infrastructure for light motorcycles, and that soon leads to making it uncomfortable for average people on pedal bikes. It's probably better to limit the e-things specifically, and not have general speed limits (at least except in specific problem zones), as those who can get into the high teens or twenties by muscle power tend to at least have experience to match, and are at least accomplishing something with some redeeming merit. Ideally this would go hand in hand with making the roads themselves safer, so that they're a more reasonable option for the light e-motorcycles (with registration plates) - and also remain an allowed option for fit vehicular pedal-cyclists. |
Originally Posted by Joe Bikerider
(Post 20979361)
I ride regularly on the Contra Costa Canal trail and it's perpendicular friend the Iron Horse Trail. Contra Costa County, East Bay Area, California. (whew). The last couple days I've experienced several dangerous encounters with E-things. First was a couple of young boys riding powered scooters weaving in and out of pedestrians. Schools out lets go?! They both looked to have very large batteries, maybe legal but certainly not legal behavior. Next was another young man who sped past me on a fat bike with tons of power and no apparent need to pedal as he sped past. Third, a middle aged man who maybe could have pedaled but instead just zoomed up the slight hill into and through the tunnel under I680. Two other E bikes passed me at speed. I know there are so many people saying they are just keeping up with their age and blah blah blah. But I don't ride to be on a motorcycle track. This is now out of control and I'm sick out it.. Incidents have be reported to the EBRPD. Regards.
|
I rode by someone on a MUP about 10mph faster than they were walking. Then went back on the correct side and passed another walker coming the other way. All seemed completely safe and within the normal. They may be in their walking forum or HOA meeting discussing how these crazy people on bicycles are flying around on their neighborhood MUP and it is dangerous. Imagine the horror if someone on a bike loses control or isn't paying attention hits someone walking!!! ;)
Obviously there are limits. Not everyone will agree on what they are. You are in a bicycle forum that probably most people ride self powered bikes. You'll get a general opinion that reflects that fact. |
The proletariat would have us believe that the e-bike is a none issue and that current legislation has already accounted for its proliferation. I guess they have yet to experience one that didn't get the memo face to face.
|
Originally Posted by u235
(Post 20979575)
I rode by someone on a MUP about 10mph faster than they were walking.... They may be in their walking forum or HOA meeting discussing how these crazy people on bicycles are flying around on their neighborhood MUP and it is dangerous.
First, there's a lot more kinetic energy involved in a 24 mph e-motorcycle vs. a 14 mph pedal bike, than there is in a 14 mph pedal bike vs a 4 mph pedestrian. And it's not the weight; kinetic energy varies as the square of the velocity. Even in a low differential velocity case, if one or both spill, they're hitting the ground (or an obstacle) at their net velocity, not the differential velocity. And obviously in a head-on case, it's worse. Next, the skills of the person on the 14 mph pedal bike are far more likely to be suited to that speed than the skills of the person on the 24 mph e-motorcycle are suited to theirs; also the design of the path is more likely to be safe at that speed. Ultimately though, it's about what the paths are *for*. The fundamental idea has always been human powered movement; the only exception being powered wheelchairs. Motors that replace what is no longer there are one thing; motors that enable something utterly new quite another. |
It's not an analogy, it's a real world argument that a non powered bike gets too. I'm not for a 24 mph anything on a MUP with people walking. You'd have a hard time convincing people getting hit by a bike or rollerblader (thought those were a thing of the past was but recently seems to have picked back up) at 14 is much better than getting hit by an ebike, powered skateboard or hoverboard at 14.
|
Originally Posted by u235
(Post 20979762)
You'd have a hard time convincing people getting hit by a bike or rollerblader (thought those were a thing of the past was but recently seems to have picked back up) at 14 is much better than getting hit by an ebike, powered skateboard or hoverboard at 14.
Comparing the original 10mph difference between getting hit at 14 mph vs 24 mph, it is in fact almost three times better in terms of energy. Perhaps even more in terms of outcome, which differs drastically depending on if someone knocked over in a collision has an opportunity to protect their head as they fall. But at slower speeds the collision is also much less likely given the increased time for the rider to react. Which is good, because of course a collision at any speed is still a bad thing that should not be happening. Many e-bikes also add the problem of having no drivechain noise, decreasing pedestrian's traffic awareness in a legitimately shared space or giving no warning if it is being operated in an illicit place or direction. |
Ive been noticing this in my area as well.
Seems every week there are more and more E mountain bikes on the MUP and with them the typical bad MUP behavior, now just magnified by instant acceleration and higher speeds. The world is constantly changing, now just faster then every..... Soon I'll be passed by lol, opps already happened..... |
You don't need a database of to see that this is a recipe for disaster. I predict a series of incidents and accidents before this is all brought under control.
|
I don’t see it getting under control anytime soon. I just now took a look at Electricbikereview.com. Most of the reviews include text about how very fast the bike is. On our boards here there’s a lot of “I can’t go as fast as I used too, I need an ebike”. But in the real world it’s all about “buy this and go fast”. And that’s exactly what people are doing.
|
You can't legislate intelligence. Very seldom do I end up using a public path. When I have I have always made other users aware of my presence. People walking there dogs, PBPs and all manner of critter on 25 foot leads. Skaters, skateboarders and scooters. Not to mention bicyclists who take no effort to let people they pass know they are approaching. Now we have added electric to the mix. In CA there are class 1, class 2 and class 3 ebike classifications. The law limits the class 1 and class 2 to 20mph of assist the law limits class 3 to 28mph of assist. According to law class 3 is not allowed on public paths and many bike lanes. These laws mean very little to many people. You can't legislate intelligence. Why do you think we have police patrolling are roads for miscreant road users. I personally don't have a problem with ebikes. It is the miscreant people using them. I avoided public paths before ebikes were a thing. A blind corner in Germany and two ladies blocking the path was my first indication that public paths were not good for riding a bicycle on. Then there was the PBP opposite the owner evidently doing his thing in the weeds. It was his 25 foot lead that was the problem. We have a major people problem her. Because it is a MUP there should be a posted speed limit. There should be fines and there should be bicycle cops patrolling for miscreant people. Personally I like the open road it is less complicated.
|
Originally Posted by Joe Bikerider
(Post 20981284)
I don’t see it getting under control anytime soon. I just now took a look at Electricbikereview.com. Most of the reviews include text about how very fast the bike is. On our boards here there’s a lot of “I can’t go as fast as I used too, I need an ebike”. But in the real world it’s all about “buy this and go fast”. And that’s exactly what people are doing.
Originally Posted by Rick
(Post 20981410)
You can't legislate intelligence. Very seldom do I end up using a public path. When I have I have always made other users aware of my presence. People walking there dogs, PBPs and all manner of critter on 25 foot leads. Skaters, skateboarders and scooters. Not to mention bicyclists who take no effort to let people they pass know they are approaching. Now we have added electric to the mix. In CA there are class 1, class 2 and class 3 ebike classifications. The law limits the class 1 and class 2 to 20mph of assist the law limits class 3 to 28mph of assist. According to law class 3 is not allowed on public paths and many bike lanes. These laws mean very little to many people. You can't legislate intelligence. Why do you think we have police patrolling are roads for miscreant road users. I personally don't have a problem with ebikes. It is the miscreant people using them. I avoided public paths before ebikes were a thing. A blind corner in Germany and two ladies blocking the path was my first indication that public paths were not good for riding a bicycle on. Then there was the PBP opposite the owner evidently doing his thing in the weeds. It was his 25 foot lead that was the problem. We have a major people problem her. Because it is a MUP there should be a posted speed limit. There should be fines and there should be bicycle cops patrolling for miscreant people. Personally I like the open road it is less complicated.
Cycling is among other things, a recreation. Therefore, we want to keep as many laws and regulations out of the picture. Unlike driving cycling is not a privileged and we want it to stay that way. That's why its up to us to be preemptive, and to keep all cycling safe and under control without the need for intrusive government legislation to come in an control everything. If not us, who then? |
Originally Posted by KraneXL
(Post 20981826)
Cycling is among other things, a recreation. Therefore, we want to keep as many laws and regulations out of the picture. Unlike driving cycling is not a privileged and we want it to stay that way. That's why its up to us to be preemptive, and to keep all cycling safe and under control without the need for intrusive government legislation to come in an control everything. If not us, who then?
Across wide differences in perspective, "government" most likely is the only viable answer - community norms only work when there is a community, and there really isn't one between pedal and throttle electric folks. |
NO MORE GOVERNMENT Cycling is among other things, a recreation. Therefore, we want to keep as many laws and regulations out of the picture. Unlike driving cycling is not a privileged and we want it to stay that way. That's why its up to us to be preemptive, and to keep all cycling safe and under control without the need for intrusive government legislation to come in an control everything. If not us, who then? The problem with this of course is that the people who share these concerns aren't the people who are the problem. Across wide differences in perspective, "government" most likely is the only viable answer - community norms only work when there is a community, and there really isn't one between pedal and throttle electric folks. |
Originally Posted by KraneXL
(Post 20981826)
They want to go fast?...great. I have no problem with that, just the locations to where they intend to do so. As I've said before, you won't find an elite cyclist going full bore on the sidewalk (or at any speed for that matter), he knows better. These new "robo" cyclist, on the other hand, have no such limitations.NO MORE GOVERNMENT
Cycling is among other things, a recreation. Therefore, we want to keep as many laws and regulations out of the picture. Unlike driving cycling is not a privileged and we want it to stay that way. That's why its up to us to be preemptive, and to keep all cycling safe and under control without the need for intrusive government legislation to come in an control everything. If not us, who then? |
Originally Posted by Rick
(Post 20981904)
I understand this and to much government intervention can create another kind of problem. Look what happened in New York City. I believe they have banned the use of all electric bikes of any kind. Some of the food delivery people were using 2500w and up ebikes. It quickly got out of control. It was dangerous. 40mph plus and on the sidewalk.
And that ban is not really being enforced; they're all over the place, going the wrong way, making pedestrians on sidewalks dodge them (personal experience!), etc, there's enough lip service to enforcement to ruin the occasional delivery guy's day and wipe out a week's wages, but not enough to actually replace an industry-wide illegal practice with a legal one; which to an extent out of competitiveness would require that everyone go legal. This isn't a case of "police officer sees illegal behavior and stops it" but rather that a few officers are assigned to go somewhere and confiscate throttle e-bikes (or write bike red lights or whatever) and ignore whatever unrelated violations not on the day's specific agenda they see while doing so. Ironically the delivery folks suffer from that inconsistency as much as anyone. If there were a near-certainty of being stopped anytime they rode something illegal past a cop, they'd have stayed on a legal footing and not be in the mess they're in where their boss (and the customers while ordering) demand one thing but the city (and the very same customers when not thinking of food) through the police demand another. I will not purchase an ebike with a throttle. It has to be pedal activated. If delivery fees were consistent with pedal power, that wouldn't solve everything, but the current situation would be toned down quite a bit. |
I ride on the road so e-bikes are a non issue for me :thumb:
|
I've found them much more an issue while trying to walk in my neighborhood than on any rides, but that's because there's not a lot of delivery business along on the trails, and the kind of recreational usage of the light motorcycle sort that the OP is encountering is fortunately still small here.
|
An EMP burst could be good clean mad scientist fun...
Somebody will look funny at you if you do though. |
Originally Posted by downhillmaster
(Post 20982264)
I ride on the road so e-bikes are a non issue for me :thumb:
Once, while riding the road, a couple young guys in "tuner" cars came racing up behind me. The first driver switched lanes suddenly behind me and the driver immediately behind him did not see me and had to cram on his brakes, locking his tires. Few things will make you jump on the pedals like a car skidding up directly behind you in full lockup. Thankfully, no crash or injury. I have thought about some alternate road routes to work, but the infrastructure here is so under built that all the reasonable alternate routes are also being used by a lot of traffic. So, I have resigned myself to MUP use wherever possible. |
Originally Posted by UniChris
(Post 20979663)
it's not the weight; kinetic energy varies as the square of the velocity.
|
don't forget skateboards!
|
Some of these machines are listing capacities of 300 pounds of cargo in addition to rider and 70 pound weight of bike. That's well in excess of 500 pounds. It's actually the other way around; they were banned before they existed; the actual issue is that they've never met the safety equipment requirements for registration as motor vehicles, though they clearly are (and have been interpreted to be such), therefore they are illegal - not as "e-bikes" (though of course that is the wording popularly used), but rather as unregistered electric motorcycles. |
Dont blame the e-bikes, blame the fool riding them. They are the same fools that speed and weave in and out thru traffic on the hiways.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.