Long Haul Trucker
Can this be a decent commuter
|
It can. I hear it rides better if you put the load on the front.
|
Absolutely. Especially if you’re planning on packing lots of stuff. It’s long, stout, and stable. Handling is neutral to slow-ish and front loads are handled easily. LHT’s touring cred is legendary. Fenders? Sure. Fat tires? Of course. Most people buying and riding LHTs know exactly what they want and they find it in the LHT. One minor quibble... a challenge to mount a kick stand. Go to Surly Bikes and dig around for their position on kick stands. Undoubtedly someone will chime in with a complaint about how much it weighs, but nobody buys a LHT because they want a featherweight.
-Kedosto |
I commute on my LHT 4 or 5 days a week - https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...18a3723917.jpg
My LHT set up as a commuter |
You know, I like everything I read about that bike, but when I look at the funky shifters I cringe.
Am I normal and those who like them weird, or is there something I'm just missing? |
Originally Posted by BookFinder
(Post 21100748)
You know, I like everything I read about that bike, but when I look at the funky shifters I cringe.
Am I normal and those who like them weird, or is there something I'm just missing? |
And some people love bar end shifters and do not like the integral brake shifter things. I do not understand why you cringe, if you do not like them then install what you want.
|
Long Haul tucker
Absolutely. If you're anticipating pressing heaps of stuff. It's long, heavy, and stable. Taking care of is nonpartisan to slow-ish and front burdens are dealt with effectively. LHT's visiting cred is unbelievable. Bumpers? Sure. Fat tires? Obviously. A great many people purchasing and riding LHTs know precisely what they need and they discover it in the LHT. One minor bandy... a test to mount a kick stand. Go to Surly Bikes and burrow around for their situation on kick stands. Without a doubt somebody will toll in with a protest about the amount it gauges, however, no one purchases on the grounds that they need a featherweight.
|
Originally Posted by steeljunkie
(Post 21100738)
I commute on my LHT 4 or 5 days a week - https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...18a3723917.jpg
My LHT set up as a commuter |
OP, rather than the LHT, maybe the Cross Check (Straggler, same bike in a disc). The CC is not super light either but the weight weenies can moan all they like, it is a great, do everything bicycle and I mean everything. Touring, gravel, cycle cross, winter road practice and just plain out road, single speed, fixie, fitness, commuting, even single track, racks, skinny tires, fat tires, even big tires, fenders are all within it's credentials and like any jack of all trades, it is not the best at any single thing but few bikes can do all of them as well as the CC.
Purchase a CC using the top tube C/C length to gauge the frame size. The cycle cross high bottom bracket and low top tube (for stand over on uneven surfaces) fools people, for example, a 54cm frame by Surly measurements is actually a 56cm for fit. |
Originally Posted by Blueweim
(Post 21100302)
Can this be a decent commuter
Don't bother with the current "touring" bike from Cannondale. It's a platypus. It looks a bit like a duck but isn't a duck and doesn't do what a duck should do. |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 21105521)
Don't bother with the current "touring" bike from Cannondale. It's a platypus. It looks a bit like a duck but isn't a duck and doesn't do what a duck should do.
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 21105521)
Don't bother with the current "touring" bike from Cannondale. It's a platypus. It looks a bit like a duck but isn't a duck and doesn't do what a duck should do.
Ok, I genuinely LOL'd. I've never been a fan of C'dale but I tried to take a look at their touring monstrosity and couldn't find it anywhere on their US website. Is it dead in the US market? -Kedosto Edited to add: Wilfred clearly has the faster fingers. |
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
(Post 21105551)
Are they still making a 'touring' bike? I know they have a line of 'allroad' or gravel bikes, but I can't find anything mentioning touring on their website.
Originally Posted by Kedosto
(Post 21105568)
Ok, I genuinely LOL'd. I've never been a fan of C'dale but I tried to take a look at their touring monstrosity and couldn't find it anywhere on their US website. Is it dead in the US market?
-Kedosto Edited to add: Wilfred clearly has the faster fingers. 1x drivetrain. 28h wheels. aluminum fork. Cdale didnt have a touring bike for the first half of this decade, then a few years ago came out with a couple models that had 2x drivetrains with very limited gearing(34-32 for example). Ultegra STI, etc etc. Overall, this is what im guessing cycco meant. |
Originally Posted by mtb_addict
(Post 21104989)
low trail not good for coommuting (dull handling).
For the largest size, the LHT has 68mm of trail. That isnt low. Surly's Pack Rat, an advertised low trail road bike, has 51mm of trail(and even that isnt shockingly low). |
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
(Post 21105551)
Are they still making a 'touring' bike? I know they have a line of 'allroad' or gravel bikes, but I can't find anything mentioning touring on their website.
Originally Posted by Kedosto
(Post 21105568)
Ok, I genuinely LOL'd. I've never been a fan of C'dale but I tried to take a look at their touring monstrosity and couldn't find it anywhere on their US website. Is it dead in the US market?
-Kedosto Edited to add: Wilfred clearly has the faster fingers. |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 21106468)
The one they offer now is their "fast" touring bike.
Not important - I am not planning to buy one (currently lusting after a Trek 920), but I find it funny. |
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
(Post 21107259)
I have followed the links, but if I navigate away from that touring bike it is impossible to find my way back. What bike category is it under?
Not important - I am not planning to buy one (currently lusting after a Trek 920), but I find it funny. |
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
(Post 21106017)
Dont pretend that you have experience with low trail vs high trail when it comes to a loaded front end. Low trail is perfectly fine for commuting.
|
Originally Posted by Blueweim
(Post 21100302)
Can this be a decent commuter
|
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
(Post 21105975)
https://www.cannondale.com/en/USA/Bi...3-65f7997ff007
1x drivetrain. 28h wheels. aluminum fork. Cdale didnt have a touring bike for the first half of this decade, then a few years ago came out with a couple models that had 2x drivetrains with very limited gearing(34-32 for example). Ultegra STI, etc etc. Overall, this is what im guessing cycco meant. |
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
(Post 21107386)
Looks like knobby tires too. Does bikepacking = touring now?
|
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
(Post 21107386)
Looks like knobby tires too. Does bikepacking = touring now?
|
Originally Posted by indyfabz
(Post 21107647)
The term originated to describe a subset of touring. Off road, minimalist, UL touring, often with frame bags instead of the usual racks and panniers. Think backpacking, but riding instead of walking. Unfortunately, some people use the term to refer to traditional (paved) road touring. That can sometimes cause confusion when questions are posed.
|
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
(Post 21107652)
What I'm inferring is that it might be the only market segment of interest to Cannondale now. ;)
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:19 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.