Old 01-12-10, 11:01 PM
  #25  
Snowman219
VICTORY IS MINE!
 
Snowman219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ogden, UT
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sauerwald
I think that as a cyclist, I should pay for parking at a rate which is comparable to the cost of providing that parking. In a similar way, a motorist should pay approximately the cost of providing his parking space. If we consider that the major cost of the parking would be related to the real-estate that the space takes up, an automobile space is typically about 8' x 20', whereas a bicycle space is about 3' x 6' - which would imply that automobile parking should cost ~ 10X the cost of bike parking. I'm not asking for anything special, I am just making the observation that we, as a society, subsidize the costs of automobiles, often in ways that we don't even think about. These subsidies hide the true cost of driving, and as a result, cause more people to use automobiles than they would use if they were not shielded from the full cost of their choices.
So many other things would be eliminated with more bike use that it would pay for itself IMO.
Snowman219 is offline