Thread: Weight on hands
View Single Post
Old 06-15-18, 12:58 PM
  #21  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
Simple. What one experiences in the typical road position is a torque about one's sit bones, created by one's upper body. This torque is resisted by counter-torques provided by the feet and hands. A torque is force X distance from the center about which it acts. So increasing the distance between your butt and hands and keeping the torque the same reduces the force necessary to create said torque. It's all true. A more stretched position reduces weight on the hands. And not only weight, but it also reduces shock forces on one's hands because the forearms are more nearly at right angles to the direction of said shock forces. Plus then the shock forces don't travel up the arms to the shoulders so much. It's more comfortable, but it does take some getting used to.

In the same manner, moving the saddle back increases the distance between butt and pedals and thus increases the counter-torque provided by the pedals.
The key though here is that this requires sufficient core to keep the torso at the same angle. For people especially top heavy with weak cores increasing reach almost always corresponds with a lower back position and more weight shifted to the hands because all the supporting is done by the hands. If you watch the average rider their arms are locked out and their shoulders are tense whereas more experienced riders have bent arms and relaxed shoulders
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
In the same manner, moving the saddle back increases the distance between butt and pedals and thus increases the counter-torque provided by the pedals.
This IMO is the better way to address the issue, along with saddle tilt. Then adjust the stem length to accommodate a normal torso position that is comfortable.
redlude97 is offline