Thread: Consider this
View Single Post
Old 05-29-19, 12:58 PM
  #7  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,029

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4894 Post(s)
Liked 4,064 Times in 2,633 Posts
In a different thread, someone posted a pic of a steel MTB with carbon fork. It had hit a tree. Fork looked perfect but both top tube and down tube were almost completely severed and bent about 30 degrees. Frame obviously destroyed but the fork looked ready to go onto another bike. Did it have hidden damage? Then there is the possibility of construction flaws. I used to build fiberglass boats. Work that is pretty can be fatally flawed. (And how much to the factories pay their help to get high quality laminates?)

As one who has paid big time for hidden damage in a fork, I will only ride forks that (almost always) show their damage. And even when I cannot see it, so far, those forks have always made it known something was wrong without me looking.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney: