View Single Post
Old 09-18-22, 06:54 PM
  #18  
hokiefyd 
Senior Member
 
hokiefyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,143

Bikes: More bikes than riders

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 766 Times in 572 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Minimum chain length allows use of the big/big combo, ie. 48/32.

Maximum length allows small/small combo.
I like the way you wrote this, and I think it makes good intuitive sense. Minimum length describes the shortest possible chain that physically permits big/big. Maximum length describes the longest possible that permits the small/small without dragging the chain on itself due to the cage angle. Anything between these two lengths will work well in most cases, though certain optimizations might be possible in certain situations.

Like you, I prefer longer chains to shorter ones.
hokiefyd is offline