Old 12-18-22, 06:47 AM
  #13  
kommisar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 157
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 33 Posts
Originally Posted by squirtdad
it sounds like your have a bike designed for a more classic front combo 52/42 or even compact 50/34 and there is not enough adjustment to allow use of a much smaller chain ring than originally designed for.
Maybe a better approach would be something that lets you lower the front derailler, instead of the the IGH route (note i have never used one, but from searching)
https://wickwerks.com/products/fit-link-adapter/
https://www.interlocracing.com/shop/...per-4421#attr=

or it could be that you are just to out of spec from what the frame supports design wise
Those are a good idea and I appreciate your input but I want to try my version of a 1x drive train. I have some experience with the IGH as I use one on my recumbent with 20" wheels where it is a no brainer to replace a front derailleur because of the step up gear and the ability to shift while stopped. In this case the advantages are less so, namely a way to aesthetically get around a frame designed for a large chainring and the ability to get a 1x range but have close gear spacing. Whether I go friction or 10 speed on the rear is a separate issue which I am virtually test running in this thread since you enthusiasts are good at pointing out potential issues.
kommisar is offline