View Single Post
Old 03-28-23, 02:53 PM
  #23  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,376
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4322 Post(s)
Liked 1,400 Times in 977 Posts
Originally Posted by Iride01
My comment was not dismissive. I said that I was supposing the AMOLED screen might be a cost saving measure. And as I didn't know if the other screens Garmin uses that can be seen better in direct sunlight cost more it's a reasonable surmise..
Repeating what I said earlier: AMOLED screens are provided on more-expensive phones and LCD screens are provided on cheaper phones. Yours is not a "reasonable surmise" at all since it's based on something you "didn't know" anything about.

Originally Posted by Iride01
You took it that I was saying that Garmin was sticking it to the customer by selling them a device with cheaper components and not passing that savings on to the purchaser. And that is absolutely not true. When I referred to cost, I was talking about the cost to the consumer.
And this is still wrong.

The Epix 2 (with the AMOLED screen) is $200 more than the Fenix 7.

https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/735611

https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/760778#specs
njkayaker is offline