Originally Posted by
RCMoeur
I did just notice that the sign being used with the beacon at this location is not the standard sign for these installations. There is a possibility that driver interpretation of those signs could be influencing behavior during the flashing red interval.
Wrong again, and more proof you didn't read the repeatedly explained issue - the one that most other thread participants immediately understood.
Drivers resuming moving are doing exactly what this device is designed to allow -
which as repeatedly explained is to move in a way that does not take the possibility of an unnoticed second user into account.
The problem is that the by
dishonestly showing incompatible signals to the conflicting users, this infernal device falsely makes it seem the crossing is still safe, at a time when in fact it is not.
Either address the repeatedly explained issues, or kindly depart the thread if you have nothing relevant to contribute.