Old 01-29-24, 09:37 AM
  #21  
fredzyn2
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: PA
Posts: 12

Bikes: Foil, Addict, Speedster, Spark 29, Unit SS, Trek 8000 gravel, Aitken S4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I have a couple "redundant" bikes. If I was pushed for a reason for why they're worth keeping, it would be a "best tool for the job" sort of idea. For example I have 3 "primary" road bikes. One is a great climber which I usually use for races, and more recently is dedicated for Zwift. One is an aero road bike and more comfortable, so I use it for longer rides or certain flatter races. And one is sort of a beater that I use for any foul or potentially foul conditions, oddball solo rides etc. A big thing I find is that cleaning and maintenance events between the three end up much further apart because the wear and tear is being spread across all 3 bikes. It's the same with my 2 main MTBs but they are much more situation specific: an FS geared 29er and an SS rigid 29er. Going to waxed chains on everything has helped a lot, especially MTB. No need for deep-cleaning drivetrain after almost every ride.

I don't think having multiple bikes drives me to ride more, though it might help. At least when they're clean. There is something about looking at a bunch of dialed-in bikes waiting to be ridden that inspires me to jump on. When everything is grimy and in need of attention it might have the opposite effect
fredzyn2 is offline  
Likes For fredzyn2: