View Single Post
Old 03-26-24, 10:39 AM
  #125  
TMonk
Not actually Tmonk
 
TMonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,305

Bikes: road, track, mtb

Mentioned: 142 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2737 Post(s)
Liked 3,335 Times in 1,742 Posts
Originally Posted by surak
But just because cycling seems accessible doesn't make it easy to translate fitness into real world success. The difference between pure W/kg Zwift champions and full-time pro riders on the road in real life, and vice versa in Zwift, is a performance gap that can be attributed to where skill factors in. As the Zwift Academy contest has evolved, recent versions have deprioritized pure W/kg in selecting winners. Instead both men and women's teams have emphasized pack riding, descending, and bike handling (bottle and musette duties). This despite offering only development positions rather than WT contracts like they used to, so there is already a lower expectation that the winners can just drop into the pro peloton. Teams have learned that they don't have the runway to waste time on riders who have the power but not the skills. And along with those requisite skills comes a preference for younger candidates who can improve in all facets of competitive cycling over a longer time period.
.
Nicely put. If the engine is really that good. you can kinda just get dropped into the World Tour peloton and do reasonably well, like Jay Vine or the aforementioned Mike Woods. But, short of a mountain top finish, it does take some skill and tact to actually win a bike race. You can't just brute force your way to a win most of the time.
__________________
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
TMonk is offline