View Single Post
Old 03-28-24, 09:08 AM
  #22  
70sSanO
Senior Member
 
70sSanO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,840

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 2,200 Times in 1,338 Posts
I think bikes are designed to fit into a range for the majority of riders so a fit on an existing bike will always be some amount of tweaking. You already have the bike, the geometry isn’t changing.

Ideally there is a goal of getting a good balance of weight that also puts the rider in a comfortable riding position. Anyone who has ridden a crank forward bike can quickly understand the effects of poor weight distribution. The rider to bike weight ratio is so significant that where it is located impacts how a bike reacts.

The curveball is when a rider experiences pain, or has physical limitations, especially with age. I’m not a fitter, but making on the fly adjustments while on a ride should be part of it. Teaching someone the how and why, even if is not absolute, will be valuable an hour or two into a ride. Obviously swapping a crank mid-century is not a viable option.

John
70sSanO is offline