View Single Post
Old 04-06-24, 01:01 PM
  #512  
seypat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,568
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3261 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times in 1,534 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
An additional factor: as in many other categories (the example of the highest-performance cars comes mind), the machines that require the greatest investment in high tech are the ones that are bought in the smallest numbers. Some of us might consider the benefits resulting from the investment to be pitifully minimal, especially in the case the most expensive bicycles, and the return on that investment is likely fairly minimal, too, but I don't see that the companies making the bikes have much choice.

They could hire Grant Petersen to help them back away from the high-end market, maybe, but doing so didn't work out particularly well for Bridgestone.
Is this the Thomas DeGent thread? When I saw the word Bridgestone, the first thing that came to mind was the Firestone/Ford disaster.

My company uses GM work vans. Before that crisis, they came with Firestone tires. Those were good tires. After that, it was expensive Bridgestones, or another brand.

Last edited by seypat; 04-06-24 at 01:05 PM.
seypat is offline