View Single Post
Old 04-15-24, 12:53 PM
  #2  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,477
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 952 Post(s)
Liked 1,213 Times in 523 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
So what's everyone's opinion about zone 3?

If you do a google search, you'll see it called the "grey zone" or the "mediocre middle". Not much love for zone 3 from the coaches.

The argument against zone 3 seems to be that it's not hard enough as zone 4 to elicit adaptation, but it is more fatiguing than zone 2.

I tend to do a fair amount of zone 3 on long climbing days, and it seems to improve my muscular endurance and the ability to spend more time just below my threshold.

On a weekly basis, I'm doing roughly equal amounts of zones 2 and 3. I figure that's decent training. Change my mind?
Just redefine your Zone 2 so it's really wide, spend almost all your time in Zone 2, and avoid talking specifics with the Zone Nazis.
RChung is offline  
Likes For RChung: