View Single Post
Old 01-27-18, 01:04 PM
  #55  
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,873

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3943 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by tandempower
For LCF, the only benefit of driverless cars is to reduce land-waste on parking lots and pavements so that destinations will be closer together and thus easier to walk/bike between. Obviously we are stuck in a situation where no one wants to give up driving because it is inconvenient to LCF, so infrastructure continues to be maintained for the sake of driving convenience where ubiquitous driving is assumed. Driverless cars have the potential to reduce the number of cars per capita if they are used properly, but obviously the problem happens when people insist that they have the right to use them in whatever way they please and how dare anyone tell them that their way is 'incorrect?!?!'
I don't see it as "correct" or "incorrect". Driving imposes some costs and possible harms on society (read: other people) and drivers should be accountable for a larger share of those costs, which will somewhat spur them to drive less.
cooker is offline