Old 04-15-20, 08:59 PM
  #15  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,271
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1981 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by Rogerogeroge
OMG, that's hilarious! Look how much that BB spindle sticks out on the drive side. Is the BB dished? What's the Q-factor, about 3 feet?

He's in the middle chain ring and there's quite a bit of sag in that chain. Methinks those inner chainrings are only operable with one or two of the sprockets on back.

I see Renee Herse all over that thing, explains a lot.
The image is an april fool's joke posted by Rene Herse themselves a couple years ago. It's not a serious bicycle setup.

https://www.renehersecycles.com/comp...ntuple-cranks/

Asymmetric BBs are a thing, by the way. It allows for a reduction in q-factor, and most riders aren't bothered by the asymmetry: the extent to which it affects leg extension and the rider's angle on the saddle is pretty subtle.
Asymmetric spindles were very common in the age when 3-piece cranksets dominated... On my '79 Fuji America, the Sugino Mighty Tour triple crankset is set up with a 142mm q-factor through the use of a spindle which is about 1cm longer on the DS than the NDS, and the bike pedals beautifully.


Last edited by HTupolev; 04-15-20 at 09:04 PM.
HTupolev is online now  
Likes For HTupolev: