View Single Post
Old 08-06-20, 10:31 AM
  #9  
fishboat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 758 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 809 Times in 471 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
First the disclaimer that the OP's butt dyno might need re-calibrating, just because a tire feels slower doesn't necessarily mean it is.

At the same time, there might be something to it, as the SK+ is ~40g per tire heavier than the "plain" SK, which isn't a dealbreaker, but all of that weight is the additional puncture resistant belting. I only have experience with the SK, which I didn't notice to be particularly draggy, at least for what it is. I have ridden both the Panaracer Pasela and the Pasela Pro-Tite, and the Pro-Tite (with that extra protection belt) did feel... clunkier.

So in the realm of internet guessing, the SK+ is probably a bit slower than what the OP is used to, but probably not as slow as he's guessing.
Good points..and a correction to my post above..I glossed over the + behind the SK..my error. I've never ridden the SK+, only the SK..which I thought felt fairly (surprisingly) close to the GK slick.

It isn't unusual for the more puncture-resistant versions of some tires to be real slugs on the road, due to added weight and a stiffer overall composition(more rolling resistance). I believe that's the case with the Schwalbe Marathons..from what I've read.
fishboat is offline