Originally Posted by
wolfchild
It's not that it's molecularly different. The issue here is that it's just empty calories without any useful nutrients...Whole fruit is never a 100% fructose but it's usually about 50/50 split between glucose and fructose plus whole fruit also comes with fibre, vitamins, minerals, anitoxidants, polyphenols, and phytochemicals which all work together in synergy.
But that's not what he said. He said "it's a different type of fructose". I'm curious as to how exactly it is different.