Old 06-05-20, 09:05 PM
  #4  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by simonsez
As my search for a new gravel bike continues I become more confused when it comes to geometry. I was able to drop by a local LBS that mainly sells Cannondale, I went in there to look at the Topstone Alloy 105, he has low stock so he wouldn't budge on price . He was, however, willing to knock $500 off a Topstone 105 Carbon which he had more inventory of. I did a bit more research on that bike and it turns out that there are significant differences in geometry when comparing it to the regular aluminum version. What sticks out the most is a BB Drop of 61 for the carbon vs 75 for the aluminium. Another significant difference was the shorter chainstay on the Carbon at 415 vs 430.

The other bikes that I'm looking at are the Checkpoint, Revolt and Diverge, all have BB Drops between 70 and 80 and their chainstays are between 425 and 430 similar to the aluminum Topstone. Seems to me that the Topstone Carbon sticks out when comparing it to the rest. I'm still a bit unclear as to how a short chainstay and low BB Drop affect the ride of a bike.

Does it make it more CX/Mountain Bikish? I'm looking for a gravel that leans more road then trails, would this be a good bike or a bad choice? I imagine it would be nice to have carbon and a bit of suspension with the Kingpin technology.

Thank you for any opinions on this matter.
If this is Bike Forums, you are most likely overthinking them.
Road Fan is offline