Old 10-26-19, 12:11 PM
  #45  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,053

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4513 Post(s)
Liked 6,389 Times in 3,674 Posts
Originally Posted by Wildwood
i can agree with that.

does a 56cm frame possess the same ride characteristics as a 62cm - given identical components?
I don't know the answer.
I don't see how it could, it's all about leverage. A longer lever has more so longer tubes should have more especially if the wall thickness is the same. That has to be why bigger lightweight frames are often noodly which can be a good thing if it's endearing to you. Thicker tubes may change that but still won't be the same.

Totally agree with the opening statement and adding that the builder and the build can be just as important.

Many bikes ride well but it can be very special when a bike really works for you, I always equate it to vinyl and digital, vinyl has soul, digital does not.
merziac is offline