View Single Post
Old 10-20-20, 06:46 AM
  #8  
Dan Burkhart 
Senior member
 
Dan Burkhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,122
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 945 Post(s)
Liked 659 Times in 372 Posts
Originally Posted by dabac
I’ve seen that pic too, and it has made me wonder.
It seems very difficult to build a wheel with the precision needed to get full thread engagement in the head using their 16 mm nipples. You’d need to hit required tension and bottom out pretty much simultaneously.
and then what about later trueing? You’d be left with a one-way margin.
Now, the bike biz has certainly had its moments of less than brilliant engineering, so maybe this is DT’s contribution to the hall of shame.
Or full head thread engagement isn’t as important as conventional wisdom would have us believe.
I think folks worry too much about bottoming out. I still strive for perfection in spoke length calculations, but based on my observations from tons of wheels coming through here for repairs, where sometimes spokes are protruding well beyond the nipple ,and supported by this view from Ric Hjertberg I now worry less about spokes being a little too long.
Dan Burkhart is offline