Thread: Flying 200s
View Single Post
Old 09-27-19, 12:57 AM
  #106  
carleton
Elitist
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Super D
Actually, I am just a shade under 6’1”, and this is a 58cm frame, I just have long arms like an orangutan and equally long legs (36.5” inseam). I feel like I need a 61-63cm top tube (but want a head tube height from a 56, long and low). No idea how I’ll find an affordable frame solution. Might be more realistic to just take a few inches off my limbs.
Have a steel frame made. You'll be much faster on a round-tubed steel bike that fits very well than on an ill-fitting superbike.

Why? Because your body is the engine and an ill-fitting bike won't let your engine perform optimally. Also, because your body is 90% of the aerodynamic drag. So, optimizing your fit optimizes your aerodynamics.

You may go through a 2 or 3 frames over a couple of years until you find the perfect geometry for you. Then, if you want, spend big money on a carbon bike that has those dimensions.
carleton is offline