Thread: Is 27.5" dead?
View Single Post
Old 09-06-19, 10:57 AM
  #45  
Tulok
Full Member
 
Tulok's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 418
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
Everyone says 26 is dead, but why? I just ride older frames and can have high end everything for cheap. Hasn’t stopped me from going fast and having fun! 4 out of 5 of my bikes are 26”. Companies have 26+. 26 tubeless. Etc.

The brand new bikes cost way too much and are not really much faster than a very good 26” full sus. Even then, a bike that’s less capable on downhills makes descending slower and longer. (Rigid 26er). Longer descents are what people want right?
Tulok is offline