View Single Post
Old 01-12-05, 06:58 PM
  #6  
AeroDog
Senior Member
 
AeroDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New London, NC (near Charlotte)
Posts: 277

Bikes: Bianchi (road), Cannondale R3000,Trek (mtb)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anhinga
I'm trying to decide between two used Cannondales, both in excellent condition. One is a 1999 R4000 CAAD4 with full D/A components and high end stem, seat post and wheels. The other is a 2002 R900si CAAD5 that's completely stock with a combination of Ultegra and 105 components. The R4000 has more miles on it, but has the D/A components; the R900si is almost brand new with less than 50 miles on it. I'm not a racer, just a serious recreational rider who does about 6-7000 miles a year. I'm sure either bike would be just fine, but I have to picke one of them. Any suggestions would be welcome.
The R4000 without a doubt. Absolutely no question. You won't regret it.
__________________
04 Cannondale R3000, Dura-Ace 10, Ksyrium SL
03 Cannondale Ironman 5000, Dura-Ace 9, Cane Creek Aros
86 Bianchi lugged steel with full carbon (Bianchi!) fork
03 Trek MTB
AeroDog is offline