Originally Posted by
McBTC
Cliffs my friend...always cliffs.
In any event, the judge is stupid if by no other reason than this statement: "The judge said Hazeldean was “a calm and reasonable road user” but was still liable to pay damages, adding: “
Cyclists must be prepared at all times for people to behave in unexpected ways.”
Gong! How can any person cyclist or otherwise be held to that type of a standard? Babysitting the world would be a full-time job; you also would never get anywhere.
Besides, if she claims they're both guilty why is one being fined and the other is not. Regardless of them putting in a claim, it should be invalidated or dismissed. A judge in the U.S. could deny the claim on those grounds. On the other hand, maybe that's how it works in the UK?