View Single Post
Old 05-22-18, 01:20 PM
  #16  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Back from the dead, eh?



I think for the average person, this could be a great bike. For a lot of rides (including our recent MI coast to coast), fat tires will be the ticket on roads/terrain where 40mm isn’t quite adequate (sand, rocks, root, loose gravel).

The 15-18mph range covers a lot of gravel rides. At those speeds, its rolling resistance (and weight) that makes the difference. A nice big tire is going to give less rolling resistance on a rougher course.

I did an experiment with a $300 30# mountain bike on excellent tires vs a $2000 20# bike, and found the speeds were pretty comparable on a ride that was fine for 40mm tires. Degrade my course at all and the bigger tires would win. The one drawback of the heavy bike was that my endurance on a 3 hour ride really took a hit – the last 35 minutes of rolling hills was hard on the heavy bike.

Wheel/tire weight makes a big difference for me on short punch rides – less so on long steady effort rides. That said the “gravelcyclist” calls tires like the 622-50 Furious Fred an “unfair advantage” (if you can fit them).

Bigger tires are always easier. The question is – are the routes you are doing pushing 40mm tires past there limit? Are there sections where you have to really slow down or be cautious on 40mm tires?
chas58 is offline