View Single Post
Old 12-27-20, 05:46 PM
  #19  
Markeologist
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Marin County, Alta California
Posts: 382

Bikes: Since new: 86 Rodriguez Tandem, wife's 87 Gitane Team Pro, 92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, 85 Fisher Comp, 88 Puch Pro, two 92 Bridgestone X0-1s; later: 66/67 Gitane Champion du Monde, 70 Gitane Super Corsa, 70 Carre, 87 Gitane Team Pro, 77/78 Ritchey Tandem

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Liked 364 Times in 161 Posts
Originally Posted by iab
Clearly, it also states "calving", which is quite the opposite of melting. All in all, it is a ****ed-up sentence.
True, sentence is poorly worded but calving is absolutely not the opposite of melting. Calving occurs at the edge/margins of the glacier, large masses of ice breaking free of the ice sheet, a process that can be exasperated by melting of the ice sheet. "Can" being the operative word here but don't get hung up on that. The original question focused on the movement of the glaciers (northward vs southward). As I and others have posted, it depends on at what period/point in time is being discussed. Since the sentence stated that the glaciers were melting that indicated during a warming period when the ice sheets were receding (i.e., shrinking towards north). Even in periods of recession, the glaciers still affected the underlying topography.
Markeologist is offline  
Likes For Markeologist: