Thread: Chains
View Single Post
Old 03-19-20, 05:05 PM
  #164  
700wheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 645
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Novalite
About that 50% increase, the 1/8 and 3/32 references the inner width / the roller length.
Most material removal (wear) occurs between pins and their plate holes, thus pin length / plates thickness also matters (most).
Since I immediately chosed chains with thicker plates (not the 3/16" standard one yet) it was 50% increase of contact surface.

And for the record, after I swapped 3/32" for 1/8", and then again to 1/8" with 3/16" plates, I ride since 3 weeks with a 1/4" chain from the motorcycle branch.
We are discussing different things. I was talking about tooth thicknesses. I just measured 3/32 and 1/8 Campagnolo cogs; dimensions were 0.085 and 0.112 respectively. So actual contact area for 1/8 tooth is 32% greater than 3/32 tooth.
700wheel is offline