Originally Posted by
octopus magic
Interestingly enough, I plugged in the numbers for the "tiny" Bridgestone/Anchor TR9 in size L (with the 555 cm top tube) and compared it to two of my current track frames (A 58cm Fuji Track Pro from 2003, and a 61cm (with a 57cm top tube) Superb Sprint (AKA Colossi Cannondale Track knockoff), and found that the reach value on the "tiny" Bridgestone was longer than both (by two or so MM anyways).
I suppose it makes total sense given it's a much lower stack frame, but it's definitely would be a useable frame for someone who's in the 6' range.
Jeez. Really?! I lusted after Anchor/Bridgestone bikes for years but avoided them for the "short" top tube. [smacks forehead]