View Single Post
Old 06-03-19, 01:20 PM
  #20584  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by paulb_in_bkln
It seems to me it's the seat tube angle that is the main, more difficult to duplicate, difference between your Rudge Aero and one of the many easy-to-find DB steel frames that would make good platforms for one of the more unusual old SA hubs, like the FW.
Yes, I think that's correct that the frame angle cannot be duplicated

But at the same time, the effect of seat tube angle is setback of the seat tube lug from the BB plumbline. That added setback, measured at teh saddle, can be compensated with a seatpost that has a higher setback.

So while you can't duplicate the ST angle, you can achieve similar setback by using a deep-setback seat post such as a Nitto S-84 or one of the lower cost high-setback posts.

Last edited by Road Fan; 06-04-19 at 01:57 PM.
Road Fan is offline