View Single Post
Old 12-26-19, 08:23 AM
  #26  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,186

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3455 Post(s)
Liked 1,454 Times in 1,133 Posts
Originally Posted by atwl77
You missed the point, it isn't about frequency or reliability. It's about what you can do if it fails. In my example above, several experienced people at the controle couldn't figure it out. A friend of mine recently had connection issues, messed around with the thing and eventually took the bike to the shop to get it rectified. I don't need this kind of stress during an ultra endurance ride. With a mechanical derailleur, all I need are spare cables (you bring them on 1000k and above, don't you?) and tools and I can fix 99% of any issue that comes up.
....
Last summer I volunteered to help staff a control. One rider phoned in, he had crashed, his bike was unable to shift into lower gears on a very hilly course. Rear cable operated derailleur was only shifting onto a few cogs. I drove back to meet him and we got his bike functioning with some prudent use of tools and cable adjustments. I did not want to try to straighten the hanger, if it broke he would DNF. I was sure that his derailleur would die on the ride, encouraged him to stop at a bike shop a few hundred yards off the route on the way to the next control and replace the rear derailleur. But, he was happy enough that his bike was functioning that he skipped the bike shop, finished the 600k on his mangled drive train.

Good thing it was a conventional cable operated system.
Tourist in MSN is offline