Originally Posted by
downhillmaster
It is most certainly not the best data available at this point. It is simply a theory with 0 testing.
There is not even one viral specialist involved in the study 🙄
It has in fact already been mostly debunked by recognized viral specialists.
The only reason it ever made the rounds is that it appeals to scared sheep.
Please show where it was debunked with anything other than more... as you dismiss it.... theory.
You seem to confuse “unknown risk” with “no risk”.
I am baffled by your risk/benefit analysis here: Unknown risk (of transmitting COVID-19) and essentially zero benefit (riding in a group vs solo). This sounds like a pretty clear “no thanks” to me.