View Single Post
Old 01-18-18, 07:32 AM
  #9  
skiffrun
Senior Member
 
skiffrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 809
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
30 miles is a nice distance. I can keep my attention to the riding / pedaling high, concentrating on cadence-cadence-cadence. Unfortunately, I haven't done my 30-mile cadence / TT route for several years -- and it shows in my avg pace on the longer rides.

140-kms is a nice distance. Perception is that it takes no more energy than 100-kms, and only takes an extra hour to hour-and-a-half -- not all day. [Quoting local RUSA #1609 when he was editor of "American Randonneur" -- "regarding 200, it's not the distance, it's the time."]

Beyond 140k, the rides are fun or not depending on several factors, not necessarily in this order:
  • ride partner(s), and sometimes just your shadow is the best, other times not,
  • the course,
  • in-shape-ness quotient.

For me, beyond 300-kms, the rides become a different kind of fun.
skiffrun is offline