Originally Posted by
livedarklions
I actually think this is just bad journalism letting the plaintiff's attorney to use the media for litigation strategy purposes. Why was there no challenge to the claim that video exists?
Well, it was Faux News....
It is quite possible that the company didn't choose to follow up. Never say something out of trial that one might wish to keep private.
I think a little more effort could have been made to verify the cyclist's route and speed. How doe one end up planting face-first into solid barrier, and blame it on the bike?
Also, can all the damage to the bike be accounted for by it simply falling apart?