View Single Post
Old 05-26-19, 03:34 PM
  #16  
jlaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 946

Bikes: 2015 Spec. AWOL Elite,2022 Spec. Diverge, 1984 Trek 620 1985 Trek 620, 1979 Trek 710

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 194 Times in 110 Posts
Just like the way in which the bike industry is 'discovering' that larger volume tires are more fun and more forgiving - something that many riders have known for years - I think that in the next few years the industry will also 'discover' more sensible gearing for all types of bikes - especially now that do-it-all bikes are catching-on. A 50-34 'compact' just doesn't do it for many people. 46-30 is starting to appear more, but I prefer rings a little bit below that.

I have a vintage sport bike that, like you are doing, I put a 39-26 MTB double crank and a nice 11-32 10 speed cassette on. I gear combos with the 39T ring really agree with me and the 26T ring is for the steeps. And, some very nice MTB doubles are affordable.

I also replaced a 50-39-30 crank (with 9 speed rear) on a gravel bike with a MTB triple 42-32-24 which I like better.

Sensible gearing for all!! Especially in hill country like where you live.
jlaw is offline