View Single Post
Old 01-04-20, 11:20 PM
  #19  
dwmckee
Senior Member
 
dwmckee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468

Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times in 229 Posts
Originally Posted by ciclista tifoso
.
Good points raised here.

There are a number of factors that play into a 'ride', of course: tire/wheel width, PSI (or lack thereof), carbon handlebars and seatposts, etc. -- all of these components will affect how 'comfortable' a bike may be as the miles add up, regardless of frame material. How much of a difference would one feel on a quality, modern aluminum frame with lower PSI, wider-width tires and carbon handlebars with padded bar tape vs carbon frame? Rhetorical question.

As some have mentioned, age of rider will probably be a factor as well, but I wonder if the difference would really be distinctly noteworthy if riding an AL frame with the above arrangement.

A hi-quality carbon frame would be ideal, of course, but it may not be as noticeable vs. a hi-grade AL frame if the components compensate..

I could be wrong, of course.
There are no doubt high end aluminum frames that have great ride quality, but tehy are few and far between because they are still heavier tahn carbon and get up to around the same pricing as good carbon. See the Merkcx example and several other manufacturers too... Carbon becomes lighter and more economical. For a budget thougt if aroubd a grand, alyminum is the best deal.
dwmckee is offline