Old 06-24-20, 09:27 PM
  #6  
mnml
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by blakcloud
I disagree with your knowledgeable friend on the Giant Brand. Giant has been making bikes longer than most manufactures and has built many of their bikes as a contractor. Giant makes great value bikes. Don't rule them out.

This has already been mentioned but having disk brakes allows you to run larger tires which can make a world of difference. For some this is not something they value. People having been riding 28 mm tires for years with ill effect and you may be one of those people. One of the other reasons I like disk brakes is how effortlessly it takes to squeeze the brakes. When it is cold and you are wet, the pull on the hydraulic lever is something a caliper brake and cable will never equal. The modulation is also an advantage.

Every bike you listed is a great bike but some are very different from each other. Most of them are endurance fits which means a more upright riding position. Typically longer head tubes among other things. The climbing bikes will be more aggressive, with more saddle to bar drop and quicker handling. Which ever you choose, good luck.

Thank you. I agree with you about Giant. They have been making bikes for a long time and from everything that I've read and heard, they are as you said "great value bikes".
Also agree on the disk breaks. I might want to go a bit wider on the tires. The clearance without pads will allow me that.
I am def looking for an endurance type of bike, but at some point they start blending to me. When I asked the sales guy about Emonda, he said that it's not endurance, but can be configured as one. The sales guy selling the Giant TCR said the same thing. I didn't include it in the list, but I tested a Bianchi. It looked as sexy as any bike, but it felt wrong for me. My back was annoyed the whole time I was on it.
mnml is offline