View Single Post
Old 12-18-17, 12:47 PM
  #20  
350htrr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada, PG BC
Posts: 3,849

Bikes: 27 speed ORYX with over 39,000Kms on it and another 14,000KMs with a BionX E-Assist on it

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1024 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by tandempower
No, because I get happiness from devoting myself to doing good deeds. So I look at pricing as a cue for how abundant or scarce something is and adjust my consumption accordingly, i.e. to leave more over for others. So if the price of peanuts is low, I buy more of those with the assumption that there is more that needs to be consumed in order not to waste them; but if the price of walnuts is high, I restrict my consumption under the assumption that they are scarce and more people will have to option of buying them if I eat them less often. I am perfectly happy to live like this and I just advocate the planting of more nut trees so tree nuts will become more abundant and thus more affordable so more people can buy and eat more of them.
There you go, I stand corrected. Not everyone thinks the same as me...
350htrr is offline