View Single Post
Old 10-26-20, 12:31 PM
  #7  
genejockey 
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,982

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10437 Post(s)
Liked 11,913 Times in 6,101 Posts
Okay, so just to be clear, I've been riding varying amounts, at varying levels of intensity and fitness for about 25 years, and for a lot of that time I was using an HRM. I have been fitter than this, and lighter than this, but the whole time, RHR and LT stayed in their same respective ranges - yes, it wasn't an official LT, but rather the "can't talk" point, where you switch from deep regular breathing to rapid breathing. Since I've used that criterion for decades, it makes sense to continue using it for LT. I have experienced big fitness gains before, and what happened was some lowering of RHR, more speed at the same HR, and the ability to sustain effort at higher HRs for longer

So, I know about changes in HR that come with fitness. What I'm saying is this is qualitatively different. I'm not complaining, because I'm going faster than I have in years, which I ascribe to losing 20 lbs, putting in more time on the bike, and pushing harder while I'm on it. It's just a strange thing I haven't experienced in all the time I've been riding. Honestly it feels as if it would be a lot harder to reach, say 174bpm than it was even just 4 months ago, but I'm going faster at 164 than I was at 174. The other thing about this shift in HR zones is that it leaves me going almost entirely by perceived exertion.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is offline