View Single Post
Old 06-01-21, 01:32 PM
  #29  
SJX426 
Senior Member
 
SJX426's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579

Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8

Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1609 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times in 1,103 Posts
Thanks all for the discussion. Lot of interesting points made.
I did the balance test with the bike in question and the elbow angle. The existing stem supports those two reference tests.
Based on the discussion, I would be surprised if 10mm makes a difference. I have several "race" geometry bikes that are all slightly different dimensions from 58 to 61 ctc st. Most are square or within a tolerance measurement of one. I would like to replicate fit on all the bikes but have a limited number of stems to choose from. This small difference, if any, allows for using the existing ones.
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
SJX426 is offline