Old 07-08-20, 10:04 AM
  #16  
msu2001la
Senior Member
 
msu2001la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,880
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,480 Times in 870 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
Personally, I’d go for a new bike. CF frames have improved dramatically with frame builders learning to dial in ride quality, designing stiffness where you want it, and compliance where you want that. All at a lighter weight.

For example, I thought my 2005 Giant TCR team, a top of the line bike at the time rode great. However my 2013 Willier Zero 7, surpasses it in every dimension. It handles more confidently because the front end is stiffer; the Bottom bracket flexes less, and yet the ride is more comfortable. By comparison the Giant rides like a brick.

Your Trek is a generation behind my Giant. I test rode your bike before buying my current Merlin. At that time CF builders were focused on stiffness, and strength. That lead to a ride that imho, feels both dead, and comparatively uncomfortable.

Current CF bikes, 7 years newer than mine have continued to improve. And there are numerous options to get exactly the qualities you want in a ride.

If it’s in your budget, I would definitely go new rather than spend a lot on a very early CF bike, which is now about 4 generations behind in the development of CF frames.
I guess it depends on the goal.

For me, a bike like this has a high cool/nostalgia factor to it, even if it's not up to current standards in terms of weight and ride quality.
I'd be willing to spend $1000-$1500 on a new groupset, wheels, and some other parts to keep it current, but acknowledge it would be a project bike that I'd do for fun.I have other bikes.

A new $2000(ish) carbon road bike with an 11sp 105 drivetrain is tough to beat. It'll likely be lighter and ride better and the OP should totally buy one of those as well. lol
msu2001la is offline